| 
	
		
			| 
			Tring’s Lost Settlementsby
 Sue Gordon
 
			A formal study of abandoned settlements began in the early 1950s and 
			in 1971 Deserted Medieval Villages by Maurice 
			Beresford and John Hurst of the University of Hull was published, 
			which contained a list of over 2,200 deserted sites throughout 
			Britain.
 
 Three from the area north west of Tring were listed: Tiscot, Betlow 
			and Pendley.  A later publication, The Deserted Medieval 
			Villages of Hertfordshire by K. Rutherford Davis, added Bure, 
			Gubblecote and Miswell. 
			More recently the 
			Hertfordshire Heritage Environment Record has 
			classified Aldwick as a deserted settlement and Puttenham as a 
			contracted village.
 
 Of these eight small hamlets, six were mentioned in the 
			Domesday 
			survey of 1086.  Miswell was the largest with nineteen 
			households and woodland for 500 pigs.  Bure was very small with 
			just four households.  For comparison, Tring was recorded as 
			having sixty-two households and woodland for 1000 pigs.
 
 Bure, Tiscot, Betlow and Aldwick were close to the present-day 
			border with Buckinghamshire in the Boarscroft Vale (geologically 
			part of the Aylesbury Vale).
 |  
			
  
Above and below: settlement sites, from left to right: Boarscroft; Tiscott; 
Aldwick; Betlow. 
 
Both maps reproduced with the kind permission of the
National Library of Scotland
 
	
		
			| 
			Bure, in the vicinity of today’s Boarscroft Farm, was probably never 
			more than a smallholding, although it is surrounded by ridge and 
			furrow.  ‘Ridge and furrow’ is the term used for the regular 
			pattern of gently curving ridges that can still be seen in some 
			fields and which are the remnants of medieval ploughing. 
			Bure was occupied by Andrew atte Boure in the early 14th century, 
			but by the mid 16th century had acquired the name Bowrscrofte 
			meaning a smallholding attached to a bower.
 
 Tiscot was larger than Bure in 1086, with twelve households and a 
			mill.  A 1334 tax assessment indicates that Tiscot was probably 
			in decline even before the Black Death arrived in 1348.  The 
			settlement was occupied in the mid 16th century but was still 
			declining.  A chapel existed for a further century but was then 
			demolished.  By the 19th century all that remained was a single 
			farmhouse which disappeared in the early years of the 20th century.  
			House platforms and a possible road can still be seen from the air 
			and the site is a Scheduled Ancient Monument.
 
 Although Betlow is not mentioned in the Domesday Book it was 
			probably occupied in the Saxon period.  The name may 
			mean Beta’s (burial) mound or hill and there is a possible Saxon 
			burial mound north of Betlow Farm.  Betlow farmhouse was built 
			in the 15th century, but may not have been the original manor house.
 
 Aldwick was called Aldwwyke, meaning old dairy farm, in the 13th 
			century.  Aerial photographs show a sunken way surrounded by 
			house platforms south of the present Aldwick Farm and adjacent to an 
			area of ridge and furrow.
 
 Closer to Tring is Miswell which had nineteen households in 1086.  
			This equates to a population of around 100 adults and yet there is 
			nothing identifiable on the ground.  All that can be seen from 
			the air are what are probably field boundaries and a pond.  
			This was once thought to be a moat but is now believed to be a 
			wildfowl ‘flight-pond’ associated with a post medieval farmstead.
 
 The lists of Deserted Medieval Villages also include Puttenham, 
			which had twelve households and two mills in 1086, and Gubblecote, 
			five households and a mill, although neither of these settlements 
			was abandoned completely.  Both had a manor house that no 
			longer exists.
 
			
  
			St Mary’s 
			parish church, Puttenham. 
			
			Puttenham’s St Mary’s parish church dates in part to the early 14th 
			century or earlier.  Earthworks north of the church were 
			surveyed in the 1980s and revealed two probable house platforms.  
			Ditches enclose the area which is now a Scheduled Ancient Monument.  
			An L-shaped pond in the grounds of the Rectory may be the remains of 
			a moat.
 
			
			
  
			Puttenham and Gubblecote. 
			
			Gubblecote was called Bublecote or Cobbelcote and means ‘Cubbel’s 
			cottages.’  Cropmarks indicate possible house plots lining a 
			trackway which runs towards a moated site.  The moat was 
			investigated in the 1970s and is perhaps the site of the manor 
			house.
 
 Why were these sites abandoned or reduced in size?  The seeds 
			of their failure were probably sown many centuries before the Black 
			Death arrived in 1348.
 
 In Hertfordshire during the Saxon period the population grew and 
			woodlands were felled for agriculture.  In Europe and Britain, 
			rising population and falling grain yields in the early 13th century 
			resulted in land available for cultivation becoming scarce: old 
			fields were exhausted and pasture was ploughed up for grain crops.  
			This had the knock-on effect of a shortage of manure, which in turn 
			reduced grain yields still further.  Prices rose and there was 
			widespread starvation.
 
 In the years from 1272 to 1320 there were unusual storms and floods.  
			But there was also reduced rainfall until 1300 followed by 
			persistently wet weather and bad harvests.  The increase in 
			rainfall would have adversely affected the small settlements in the 
			Boarscroft Vale where the soil is impermeable and causes winter 
			flooding.  As farming became uneconomic the inhabitants would 
			have migrated to nearby larger communities.
 
 By the middle of the 18th century, and most probably long before, 
			the hamlets of Bure, Tiscot, Betlow and Aldwick had disappeared and 
			there remained only a single farm in the vicinity of each.
 |  
 
 
Dury & Andrew’s map of Tring (1766). Miswell top left; 
Pendley, centre. 
	
		
			| 
			
			The possible reasons for Miswell’s abandonment are not so clear.  
			Unlike the settlements further north, Miswell is not on the wet 
			marshy ground of the Boarscroft Vale although it does have a 
			plentiful supply of water in the form of a spring.
 
 Given its larger size in 1086 and its proximity to the Ickneild way 
			you would have expected Miswell to have survived.  Perhaps it 
			was too close to the successful town of Tring and when times got 
			tough its inhabitants moved to the larger community with its market.
 
 
				
					
						| 
						 |  
						| 
						Pendley Manor |  
			The disappearance of the village 
			of Pendley had other causes.  In 1086 Pendley had seven 
			households – so it was not large.  By the early 15th century 
			the settlement appears to have grown and was part in the parish of 
			Tring and part in Albury.  In 1440 the Lord of the Manor of 
			Pendley, Sir Robert Whittingham, was granted hunting rights by Henry 
			VI.  The grant allowed the enclosure of 200 acres as a park.  
			In the process cottages and hedgerows were removed and arable fields 
			turned over to pasture resulting in the loss of common grazing 
			rights.
 A later commentator, writing in 1506, stated that before the 
			emparkment, Pendley was ‘a great town’ supporting ‘more than 
			thirteen ploughs and handicraft men such as tailors, shoemakers and 
			cardmakers’.  Allowing for exaggeration, Pendley was probably a 
			sizable village at the time of its destruction.
 
 Whittingham’s family sold the manor in the early 17th century and 
			the medieval park is not shown on a map of 1676.  The manor 
			house that Whittingham built, probably in the 16th century, was at 
			the west end of Pendley village.  Today only slight earthworks, 
			which could possibly be signs of the village, are visible to the 
			east of Pendley Manor.
 |  
			
			――――♦――――
 
 
 
   |