| 
 FOLLOWING the 
		collapse of Harney's Friend of the People, the demise of which 
		was foreshadowed some time earlier, Massey had to concentrate his 
		activities on lecturing.  Despite his advertised large prospectus 
		it is not certain just how successful he was in obtaining bookings for 
		the spring of 1853, and he may have been limited to provincial 
		mechanics' institutes and working men's associations.  Harney again 
		made two attempts at a weekly paper.  The Vanguard which he 
		commenced in January of that year survived for only three months, and 
		Massey made no signed contributions to it, although an article ‘The 
		Political Refugees’ may have been written by him.  The Beacon, 
		from October 1853 to January 1854 proved equally unsuccessful, and again 
		there are no signed contributions by Massey.
 
 In the spring or summer of 1853 the family moved probably to 
		cheaper but much smaller rooms in 12, New North Street, Red Lion Square 
		where Massey's second child, Cecilia Geraldine was born on the 4 
		October.  Due to her pregnancy and following the birth of Cecilia, 
		Rosina had been unable to continue with her clairvoyant consultations, 
		and their finances became once more a cause for concern.  
		Fortunately Massey was able to obtain a post later that year as 
		book-keeper to the publisher John Chapman, probably taking over the 
		vacancy from a Mr Hogg, who had been employed at a salary of £120 per 
		annum.[1]  Chapman rented out some of the rooms 
		in his large Strand house, of which one occupant from 1851 to October 
		1853 was George Eliot, and held Friday evening literary discussions with 
		persons notable in the scientific and literary fields.  Improved 
		financial prospects induced the family to move again, this time to 
		better accommodation at 28, Henrietta Street, Brunswick Square.  
		After the limited success of Voices of 
		Freedom, Massey was encouraged to prepare a further volume of 
		verse, incorporating into it his earlier poems.  By January 1854 
		Massey had completed his best known poem, the birth to early death 
		tragedy of ‘The Ballad of Babe 
		Christabel’; while an unconscious premonition of ensuing events, the
		Ballad was not, however, inspired by the death of his daughter, 
		Christabel, who lived to a ripe old age (d. 1934):
 
			
				
					| 
					...
 It fell upon a merry May morn,
 I' the perfect prime of that sweet time
 When daisies whiten, woodbines climb,
 The dear Babe Christabel was born...
 
 O happy Husband! happy wife!
 The rarest blessing Heaven drops down,
 The sweetest blossom in Spring's crown,
 Starts in the furrows of your life! ...
 
 And thus they built their Castles brave
 In fairy lands of gorgeous cloud;
 They never saw a little white shroud,
 Nor guess'd how flowers may mask the grave...
 
 And still her cheek was pale as pearl,
 It took no tint of Summer's wealth
 Of colour, warmth, and wine of Health:
 Ah! Death's hand whitely pressed the Girl!
 ...
 |  The Ballad of Babe Christabel: together with other Lyrical 
		Poems which included a portion of the 1851 biographical sketch by 
		Samuel Smiles, was paid for by Massey and published by David Bogue in 
		February 1854 after being submitted unsuccessfully to other publishers, 
		including John Chapman.  The reviews followed quickly.  
		Hepworth Dixon, chief editor of the Athenæum journal casually 
		picked it out from a number of other items marked for review on his 
		desk, and noticed one particular poem that seemed to be familiar.  
		He remembered that two years earlier he had been browsing in a bookshop 
		in the Gray's Inn Road while sheltering from a rain shower, and had 
		looked through a bound edition of Harney's Red Republican.  
		Inside the dust-wrap cover, under the index, had been a poem 'The Song 
		of the Red Republican' by G. M. that had been published originally in 
		Cooper's Journal.  Yes, this was certainly the author.  
		Dixon was going to spend the Sunday in Brighton with Douglas Jerrold, 
		former editor of the Shilling Magazine and contributor to 
		Punch, so he took the book to show him.  Both men were 
		impressed with Massey's natural poetic ability.  Dixon reviewed the 
		book in the Athenæum, in which he introduced Massey as a young 
		poet — and as something more:
 A man whose ear - though not yet tuned to the complete and glorious 
		harmonies of our English tongue - is sensitive to rhythm . . . whose 
		imagination throws out images in sonorous words . . . so that sound and 
		image seem identical . . . He is a true poet, - but he has grievous 
		defects . . . he lacks culture. He requires taste. His ear is defective. 
		(Yet), our workman-poet has become a teacher to his class. He speaks to 
		them in passion - counsels, exhorts, inspires them with his own vehement 
		and vigorous spirit . . . many a line suggests - and many an image 
		vivifies - the idea of a vast social revolution as that which appears to 
		him the natural and inevitable path of issue into a better state.[2]
 
  Charles Tilt's bookshop at the corner of 86 Fleet Street 
		and St. Bride's Lane
 (Payne's Illustrated London, 1846-1847)
 Became 
		Tilt & Bogue from 1841-3, then David Bogue to 1856.  Massey had his
		Ballad of Babe 
		Christabel, War Waits, and 
		Craigcrook Castle published 
		there. Douglas Jerrold's review appeared the following day in 
		Lloyd's Weekly, referring to 'Babe Christabel' as wholly a thing of 
		beauty.[3]  Walter Savage Landor's comments in a 
		review letter to the Morning Advertiser mentioned some faulty 
		metre and the use of substantives as verbs (e.g. 'rainbowed'), but 
		considered, together with other praise, that 'Massey has given us 
		thoughts and expressions which remind us of Shakespeare in the best of 
		his sonnets.' [4]  Favourable reviews in most of 
		the main newspapers and journals and especially by these three 
		influential literary personages gave a major impetus to sales.  A 
		second edition was produced in March, following which the third was 
		brought out in June (published in America as 
		Poems and Ballads), the 
		fourth in November and the fifth the following February, 1855.  
		Although selling five thousand copies, the author's final proceeds 
		amounted to only fifty pounds, the book having to be re-set for each 
		edition.
 
 But amid the praise, there was one non-committal review and 
		one that was distinctly adverse.  The Westminster Review 
		wished that Massey would subject himself to a rigorous course of study 
		and self-culture, before venturing into print again.[5]  
		However, G. H. Lewes, in the Leader, went further by referring to 
		‘Admiration pushed to absurdity by the Athenæum’, declaring that:
 Gerald Massey has a prodigal command of words, a faculty of poetic 
		expression, and a certain spontaneity of song, which may hereafter 
		develop into poetry worthy to be called by the name.  He wants some 
		of the characteristic qualities of a poet — taste and good sense, for 
		example …[6]
 The following week a more caustic extension was added:
 Our readers must have been somewhat amazed — as we ourselves were — 
		last week by the chaotic article on Modern Poets, wherein, among 
		other incongruities, we were made to praise, with all the emphasis of 
		italics, some of Gerald Massey's lines emphasised for special 
		disapprobation … By an accident at the printer's … we had our proof 
		‘shorn of its fair proportions’ … after quoting liberally and 
		approvingly specimens of the really good writing in Gerald Massey's 
		volume, we had, in all fairness, to point out some of the defects; the 
		passage in which this was done was dropped out by accident, and we now 
		restore it from a copy of our proof … [7]
 Lewes complained and gave examples of ‘fantastic tricks 
		played with the English Language’, and of ‘the tawdry splendour of fine 
		phrases’.  He quoted one passage which contained ‘vices and 
		affectations’, which was marked by Massey's liking for contracted words 
		at that time.  ‘Heaven'd’, ‘region'd’, ‘jewell'd’ and ‘swirl'd’, 
		may have been influenced by Landor's enthusiasm for the fidelity of 
		spoken sound.[8]  Lewes concluded his censure 
		with:
 The passage thus restored may explain the verdict which on summing up 
		we had to pronounce upon the writer, but which must have seemed to the 
		reader unjustified by the specimens given, the more so as we appeared to 
		praise the affectations no less than the beauties.  (N.B. Since the 
		foregoing was in type we have received a letter from Mr. Massey, which 
		proves — if proof were needed — that the want of good sense and taste we 
		noticed in his poems extends to his letters.)
 The letter Lewes referred to was mentioned in a communication 
		from George Eliot to Sara Hennell, written on the 9th March:
 Mr. Lewes has just come in and put into my hands the enclosed letter 
		from Gerald Massey, which shew Mr. Bray.[9]  Be 
		it noted, that the 'letter' G. Massey refers to contained the question 
		when was Mr. L. going to review G.M.'s book, as he (G.M.) meant to 
		advertise in the Leader.  Also, that Mr. Lewes has been very 
		kind to Gerald Massey as an author …[10]
 One may speculate that if Massey had not written so 
		impetuously, the review might have continued in moderately critical 
		vein, without the more caustic comments presented the following week.  
		A few days later, on 15 March, George Eliot wrote in a letter to Charles 
		Bray, ‘… I thought it right to let you know the worst side of Gerald 
		Massey,[11] for his sake as well as yours, for 
		Athenæums and Savage Landors can only lead to perdition.  
		Otherwise I should be sorry to expose a ‘fellow sinner.’[12]  
		Charles Bray had met previously with the Masseys at his home in St. 
		James', in January 1853.  In his autobiography he mentions:
 We had Mr & Mrs Gerald Massey staying with us.  She exhibited in 
		public professing to be able to read without her eyes.  Her eyes 
		were carefully tied over, or you were allowed to put your hands over her 
		face, but I noticed that she could not read until the bandage was 
		considerably displaced, and she was obliged to go to the light, and if 
		when you held her eyes, you did it effectually, she always complained 
		that you hurt her till you gave her more space.  My opinion in this 
		case was that there was no more than an exaltation of the natural sense 
		of sight, which enabled her to see under conditions which she could not 
		do in her ordinary natural state.[13]
 W. E. Adams also mentions a 
		case of mesmerism and blindfold reading which he saw probably in the 
		early 1850s.  A girl of about his age had her eyes held by Adams 
		while he produced a book from his pocket which she had never seen.  
		At a random page she was able to read well, though Adams was quite sure 
		that she could not possibly see at all.[14]
 
 It has been attributed by various sources that Gerald Massey 
		was the 'natural' for George Eliot's Felix Holt, the Radical.  
		This was presented in J. Churton Collins' Studies in Poetry and 
		Criticism, 1905, in Sir Sidney Lee's portrait of Massey in the 
		Dictionary of National Biography, 1912, and in later publications.  
		The earliest reference I can trace is in the American Banner of Light 
		of 1 December 1883.  It states, ‘Friends of Marian Evans (George 
		Eliot) have heard her say that she had the character and career of 
		Massey in mind when she portrayed her Felix Holt, the Radical.’  
		Alfred Miles' Poets and Poetry of the Century, 1897, then repeats 
		the statement.  Unfortunately no source is given for any of this 
		information, and it is difficult to attribute to Massey either the 
		physical characteristics of Felix Holt, with his mild radicalism, and 
		with only slight interest in political causes. 
		Holyoake defined Felix Holt as a positivist, 
		and one who fulfilled George Eliot's idea as to the radical which ought 
		to be.[15]  It is known that Eliot studied 
		various works preparatory to writing Felix Holt, which probably included
		Samuel Bamford's 
		Passages in the life of a 
		Radical, 1844, as well as using for her portrayals 
		characteristics of persons she met while staying at Chapman's house.  
		Although she probably met Massey casually at that time, it is unlikely 
		that they had any form of acquaintanceship, despite Eliot in 1868 asking 
		her publisher to send Massey a copy of her Spanish Gypsy.  
		Gordon Haight is unable to explain her reason for this, and there are 
		none of Massey's books listed in the Eliot-Lewes library catalogue.[16]
 
 At that time Massey was secretary to the Society of the 
		Friends of Italy. Formed to promote more popular sympathy in England and 
		to influence foreign policy by propaganda towards its democratic cause 
		as promoted by Mazzini, the society had many persons of literary 
		influence on its committee. Douglas Jerrold, Walter Savage Landor, W. J. 
		Linton, George Jacob Holyoake and G. H. Lewes were active supporters, 
		which helped to make Massey's name more widely known.[17]
 
 Massey sent copies of his book to friends and literary 
		persons, including Louis Kossuth, Thomas Carlyle, John Ruskin and Alfred 
		Tennyson.  This was a common practice among new authors, who were 
		able to edit any favourable response for inclusion in later editions or 
		future works.  Kossuth commented, ‘Thanks, many thanks for your 
		gift, which I value very much indeed.  It will do good to my 
		chilled heart, to warm at the fire of your genius …’[18]  
		The cynical Thomas Carlyle wrote to thank him, and added:
 I wish I could do anything to help towards maturity and real 
		usefulness such a talent as yours … it is to your own truthfulness … 
		piety and loyalty of mind, that we must look for a solution of that 
		problem; help is not elsewhere,—else—in various forms, is hindrance 
		mainly!
 
 I have not anything to say on these sorrowful times through which we are 
		now passing.  To my mind the greatest fountain of them all is 
		(little as we yet suspect it) precisely excess of ‘saying’ and talking 
		and palavering,—which the English Nation, for a great while past, has 
		grown to consider as the chief function of man, and the substitute for 
		silent hard work in all kinds.  I believe the cure of 
		Balaclava,—and of the universal ‘Balaclava’, which that small Crimean 
		one is but a symbol of,—lies far beyond the dominion of speech: at any 
		rate my sad ominous thoughts upon it are better to be kept silent than 
		spoken, if they were even speakable …19
 Ruskin respected Massey's genius, but thought he was ‘too hot 
		a socialist’.[20]  Tennyson referred to Massey's 
		‘captivating volume’, and although ‘you make our good old English tongue 
		crack & sweat for it occasionally . . . Time will chasten all that.’[21]
 
 The author and journalist Eliza Linton received a copy, and 
		wrote an enthusiastic acknowledgement referring also to Landor's 
		continued interest in Massey following his earlier review in the 
		Morning Advertiser:
 I was with dear Mr. Landor not long ago, and you have quite a warm 
		niche in that brave noble heart of his.  He seems to have a 
		fatherly love for you, and to be proud of your success … I wasted 
		not one but many tears over the sweet Babe Christabel … I could 
		scarcely have believed that a man could have written it … If you 
		have been praised by the Athenæum, you have muzzled the great Cerberus 
		of all, have you not? … Why has the Leader flown at your throat?  
		I thought you were a great pet of theirs—for I have heard you spoken of 
		by me of them at least very affectionately and I was surprised at the 
		onslaught, and pained too.  I hope Mrs. Massey is better, and that 
		all will be bright and golden with you …[22]
 The following letter was written by Massey to Samuel Smiles, 
		former editor of the Leeds Times, whose article in Eliza 
		Cooke's Journal encouraged Massey to continue as a ‘people's poet’ 
		following the publication of Voices of 
		Freedom.  Smiles at that time was contemplating commencing 
		a newspaper in London, but later decided against the idea.
 28, Henrietta St.,
 Brunswick Square.
 My dear Sir,
 I have just sent off the small parcel of my books including one in Cloth 
		which I hope you will accept from me.  The Review in the 
		Athenæum has given a strong impetus to the sale, but I shall not be 
		able to take advantage of the tide of success for want of means to 
		advertise.  I was somewhat surprised to hear what you had in 
		contemplation.  The establishment of a Cheap Newspaper is a 
		formidable affair.  I had a taste of that some time ago.  A 
		friend of mine bought O'Connor's Star and started the Star of 
		Freedom of which I was one of the Editors.  He spent 700 or 800£ 
		and it failed.[23]  To be sure, there 
		were many reasons for the failure.  It was damned already in public 
		opinion, and the old partisans had dwindled down to a thousand 
		subscribers.  At the same time Ernest Jones started his Paper and 
		we were beaten, as we considered it better to give up than to exist on 
		such terms as he did.  And then again, Harney is used up and worn 
		out; he never was anything more than one of the barnacles that stuck to 
		O'Connor.[24]  I wrote the reviews and 
		most of the leading articles in addition to compiling a portion of the 
		news.  I still think there is room for a paper if it could be made 
		well known, and I should like to have a hand in the undertaking.  I 
		suppose I shall drift into Journalism like others, by force of 
		circumstances; very few persons I think would do it from choice.  
		Just now I am doing nothing saving a weekly letter to the New York 
		Tribune, and am greatly in want of something.  I hope if you 
		should come to London to start a paper, you will not complete your 
		arrangements without remembering me.  I have not been at Chapman's 
		for some time past.  I found my engagement there only a mere stop 
		gap.  I must either get something soon or emigrate, for we have 
		spent the last 2 years in miserable plight.
                                                   
		I am dear Sir,Yours truly,
 Gerald Massey.[25]
 Chapman had moved from the Strand to Blandford Square in May, 
		and this was probably when Massey left the firm.
 
 The third edition of Babe Christabel published in April 
		contained a preface in which Massey explained why he had included his 
		political pieces, for which he had been considerably censured.  
		Although many people still held those views which he had so forcibly 
		expressed, his opinions had changed to a less radical though still 
		strongly socialistic direction.  At the time those rebellious 
		feelings were quite natural, and were his deliverance from what he 
		termed ‘a fatal slough’:
 For the slave, degradation and moral death are certain; but for the 
		rebel there is always a chance of becoming conqueror; and the force to 
		resist is far better than the faculty to succumb … My experience tells 
		me that Poverty is inimical to the development of Humanity's noblest 
		attributes.  Poverty is a never ceasing struggle for the means of 
		living, and it makes one hard and selfish.  To be sure, noble lives 
		have been wrought out in the sternest poverty.  But they were so in 
		spite of their poverty, not because of it …
 The fourth edition of Babe Christabel (1855) had one 
		long and quite perceptive review, which noted Massey's originality of 
		imagery and description resolving themselves into epithets of 
		colour—unusual in a lyrical poet.  Certain lines suggestive of 
		plagiarism were mentioned, but the good-hearted reviewer thought they 
		might be unconscious reminiscences of other poets or, used openly as 
		common property, due to their intrinsic excellence.  But 
		disintegration of metre was condemned, and it was hoped that the author 
		would never again attempt blank verse, the reviewer preferring to 
		‘listen to Mother Hubbard's dog playing on the fiddle’.[26]
 
 Because of Massey's immediate popularity and his biographical 
		sketch, John Blackwood of Blackwood's Magazine had approached him 
		regarding the possibility of writing about his personal experiences 
		within a socio-political framework.  Massey replied, asking for 
		further suggestions.  Unfortunately for period history, this 
		autobiography was later commenced but never completed:
 28 Henrietta St.,
 Brunswick Sq.,
 London.
 Dear Sir,
 
 I pray you accept my best thanks for your very kind note to me, and for 
		the friendly suggestion it contained. I have long had thoughts of 
		attempting such a work as you mention but have distrusted my limited 
		experience and my powers of transmuting that experience into a Book.  
		Again, I have been somewhat deterred by ‘Alton Locke’ which contained a 
		great deal of my experience, admirably rendered.  So much so that I 
		should fear the charge of plagiarism were I to claim my own.  I 
		should certainly have an advantage over Mr. Kingsley in having lived my 
		life, whereas he only sympathised with it.  I have had a little 
		experience in writing prose, but, only in the shape of Newspaper 
		Articles.  As regards my present opinions on Society, Religion, and 
		Politics—it would just take a Book to work them out in, therefore, I 
		cannot pretend to give you them in a letter.  Suffice it to say 
		that I have passed thro' various phases and vast changes during the last 
		few years and I am still striving upwards and caring less for mysteries 
		as I get nearer to the heart of things.
 
 When I have been thinking of writing a Book I have generally concluded 
		that it should be an Autobiography—can you give me any advice on this 
		point?  My chief points or heads for my subject would consist of 
		Childhood among the Poor—life in a Factory—Character among the people 
		and the effect of Circumstances on its development—Village heroes—the 
		Calvinists among whom I was brought up—coming to London—Life as Errand 
		Boy,—as Draper—as Secretary of a Co-operative Association—Lecturer and 
		Litterateur—Courtship—Marriage—Children—these with my internal 
		revolutions—passions—mental developments—and especial ‘goes on’ at the 
		Mill and Manchester Men—and that Beast Reynolds[27] 
		whose ‘mysteries’ have such a pernicious effect on the ignorant poor and 
		a dash of ‘Clairvoyance’ of the existence of which I have greater proofs 
		than most men as my Wife possesses the faculty prominently.
 
 This would be my main material. Think you it would do?  I shall be 
		glad to hear your opinion. I have thought of killing my 'hero' at the 
		commencement and editing his MSS which would permit me to maintain my 
		present standpoint in surveying my past. I cannot possibly tell what 
		should constitute a specimen by which you could judge?  And how do 
		you mean to help me toward publishing it were it to suit you?  Will 
		you be good enough to present the Author of ‘Fermilion’ with a Copy of 
		my Book which I will send per post?  Excuse my troubling you at 
		this Length and believe me Dear Sir
                                                  
		Yours RespectfullyGerald Massey.
 P.S. I forgot to mention that I should give a version of the Chartist 
		affair of '48 with some sketches of ‘Patriots’ whom I have met.[28]
 The reference to ‘Fermilion’ was a satirical review article 
		written by William Edmondstoune Aytoun, Professor of Literature at 
		Edinburgh University, in which he criticised Fermilian: or the 
		Student of Badajoz. A Spasmodic Tragedy by T. Percy Jones.[29]  
		This 'T. Percy Jones' was himself, and he had not yet written the book 
		he was criticising![30]  His censure was against 
		what he termed the ‘Spasmodic School’, poets of which were noted for 
		extravagant expressions of sentiment and mysticism emphasised in varying 
		quality of style.  This was directed particularly against Sydney 
		Dobell, whose epic poem Balder. Part the First was the subject of 
		a favourable review article by Massey.[31]  
		Aytoun had stated also: ‘When one of our young poetical aspirants, on 
		the strength of a trashy duodecimo filled with unintelligible ravings, 
		asserts his claim to be considered as a prophet and teacher, it is 
		beyond the power of humanity to check the intolerable tickling of the 
		midriff.’  Massey and some of his friends questioned if this 
		sentence referred to his first edition of Babe Christabel, as 
		this was published in duodecimo size.  His letter to Aytoun, sent 
		via Blackwood in 1854 for forwarding read:
 Sir,
 As one of the Readers of your glorious article—‘Fermilion a Tragedy’—and 
		as one that enjoyed it with immense gusto, permit me to thank you for 
		it; and at the same time to mention that some very kind and attentive 
		friends have construed some of your words into a notice of my Book.
 
 You speak of a ‘trashy duodecimo’ & my own guilty conscience tells me I 
		have said many foolish things and thereby lends countenance to the 
		statement of the aforementioned friends. In case it was intended for me, 
		I beg to ask you to read the preface of my 3rd.  Edition, a Copy of 
		which has been sent to you, and you will see that I do not claim the 
		title of ‘Prophet & Teacher’. I never said such a thing, never thought 
		of such a thing.  If such words have been spoken of me, I am not to 
		be responsible for all the foolish things said whether uttered by the 
		Revd. Gorgeous Gilfillan or the Athenæum.[32]  
		Excuse me for troubling you, and I trust you will not attribute to me 
		the object attributed to Apollodorus[33] in 
		writing to the ‘Great ones in the land’.
                                            
		I am dear SirRespectfully
 Yours Gerald Massey[34]
 Although there is no record of Massey sending a copy of his 
		book to Walt Whitman, a note written by him showed that he had received 
		a copy and made comments:
 
 
 
			
				
					| "1855 
					– I have looked over Gerald Massey’s Poems - London. 
					- They seem to me zealous, candid, warlike, - intended, as 
					they
 surelyare, to get up a strong feeling against 
					the British aristocracy both in their social and
					governmentalpolitical capacity. 
					― 
					Massey, I hear, is a youngish man, a radical, an editor now 
					I believe in one of the provincial towns. 
					― 
					His early life laborious, a workman in a factory I think."
 
					
					Walt Whitman, Note on Gerald  Massey, 1855,Trent Collection 
					of Whitmaniana, David. M. Rubenstein Rare Book & Manuscript 
					Library, Duke University. |    
			
				
					| 
					 |  
					| 
					Walt Whitman in 1854.A steel engraving by Samuel Hollyer
 from a lost daguerreotype by Gabriel Harrison.
 |  
		The 
		"provincial town" to which Whitman refers, is Edinburgh.
 During Massey’s later 
		tours of America he had not made contact with Whitman.  However, in an 
		article 'New Englanders and the Old 
		Home' he made a brief reference to Whitman and to Charles Dickens' 
		Hon. Elijah Pogram. (Quarterly Review, vol. 115, Jan. 1864, 
		42-68.)  Dickens’ Life and Adventures of Martin Chuzzlewit  
		written in 1843-44 following his visit to America in 1842, had referred 
		to the Americans as brash, vulgar and boastful.  Epithets that caused 
		considerable irritation in that country.
 
 Following the publication of Babe Christabel, Massey 
		concentrated on making literary contacts and had little time for 
		writing, apart from a poem and an article ‘Mazzini 
		and Italy’ for the Northern Tribune.  His wife, Rosina, 
		was in poor health while expecting their third child, and they made yet 
		another move, from Brunswick Square to 14, Oak Villas, Oak Village, 
		Kentish Town.  Since his review of Sydney Dobell's Balder he 
		had continued with friendly communications with this author, who wrote 
		to him from Edinburgh on 17 August:
 
			
				
					| My dear Massey,
 My Wife is I believe about to write a word of sympathy on the subject of 
		yr Invalide & her expected trouble & I will only say therefore—what, 
		after all, sums up the whole that can be said—God help her—& you … 
					[35]
 |  Exactly what trouble Rosina was having at that time is not 
		recorded, but it was probably a depressive precursor of greater health 
		problems to which the family would be subjected during the following 
		years.  Marian Mertia was born one week later on 24 August 1854.
 
 The fifth revised and enlarged edition of Babe Christabel, 
		published in February 1855, was dedicated to Lady Marian Alford ‘as a 
		small memento of respect and gratitude’.  Hepworth Dixon, chief 
		editor of the Athenæum was friendly with Lady Marian Alford, 
		widowed daughter of the second Marquess of Northampton.[36]  
		Her son, John William Spencer, was the second Earl Brownlow.  Dixon 
		had mentioned Babe Christabel to them and given them details of 
		Massey's background together with a summary of the family's present 
		circumstances.  Lady Alford was considerably impressed, also by the 
		fact that Massey's birthplace was near to Ashridge.  This prompted 
		her patronage, in which she either paid for publication of that edition, 
		or gave Massey financial assistance.  In addition to the 
		dedication, Massey named his third daughter Marian after her.
 
 
		 
 Lady Marian Alford, from an oil-painting
 (Trustees of the British Museum).
 
 
  
		John William Spencer, Earl BrownlowIn Massey's 'In Memoriam'. (British Library copy only).
 Not having been able to obtain permanent employment since he 
		left Chapman, his financial state was becoming quite critical.  He 
		had managed to remain solvent that year, 1855, by contracting some 
		unsigned biographical sketches for Bogue's Men of the Time, for 
		which he wrote for personal information to Sydney Dobell (for Alexander 
		Smith the poet), Louis Blanc, and Ferdinand Freiligrath the German poet 
		and Communist.  Also that same year Bogue published his Crimean war 
		poems, War Waits, dedicated to 
		John Bright, the anti-Corn Law campaigner and noted orator against the 
		Crimean war.  Despite Massey referring to these poems as ‘rough and 
		ready war-rhymes’, the reviews were quite approving.  The 
		Edinburgh News mentioned their 'beauty of expression and imagery', 
		and wrote in general terms of the author's 'nervous, vivid and 
		impassioned' style.  The Athenæum again praised his 
		descriptive power: 'After verses so vigorous that it seems to echo the 
		tramp of horses and the roar of cannon, most of our minor minstrels 
		would be tame . . .'[37]  It then added a shrewd 
		comment, ‘The charge, the contest, the retreat are vividly drawn by the 
		writer, who has never seen a squadron in the field.’  Sydney 
		Dobell, attracted to Massey since the Balder review, wrote to the 
		Rev. R. Glover:
 I enclose you Gerald Massey's ‘War Waits’, and know how heartily you 
		will respond to their fine flushing enthusiasm. . . If you don't know 
		his other works yet, by all means lose no time in seeing them, and in 
		reading his Preface, which contains sentences of prose which Milton 
		might have written …[38]
 Those literary works were financially unrewarding.  
		However, by March, Massey had obtained the promise of a post as an 
		editor on the Edinburgh News, due probably to some assistance 
		from Dobell who may have been the reviewer of War Waits.  
		Rosina was now expecting their fourth child.  Massey wrote to 
		Harney on the 21 March, whom he had been expecting to meet during the 
		family's journey to Edinburgh:
 It's all up about our coming to Newcastle.  I find that we go 
		straight on to Edinburgh in one night and in less time than it will take 
		to go to Newcastle.  Mrs. Massey is already knocked up and very 
		poorly and thinks we had better go direct … We shall be in a precious 
		fix in moving and this plan will obviate the necessity of our all 
		sleeping in London after the goods are moved and packed up in a ten feet 
		room …[39]
 Just before moving he had time to write to
		James Macfarlan, the Glasgow 
		‘Pedlar-poet’ who had sent him a copy of one of his volumes of poems:
 Dear Sir,
 I have received your pleasant little Vol and your kind letter.  
		Many thanks for both.  There is one thing in your lines I protest 
		against; it is, calling Fame ‘'fickle’.  Notoriety maybe; but true 
		Fame is fame for ever.  But, Fame—grand lady as she is—can 
		never be a true Poet's Mistress, he cannot worship her, she is only 
		hand-maiden to his Beloved.
 
 If you are a Poet, be sure Fame will find it out.  There is no need 
		for haste, the Spring will come, the rose will blow, the Poet will be 
		recognised for what he is.
 
 I am in expectation of seeing auld Scotland in a few days—I go to 
		Edinburgh —how far is that from Glasgow?
 Macfarlan's friend J. P. Crawford had scribbled on the 
		letter: ‘Sold to me by Macfarlan for a 6d to Buy drink no doubt’.[40]
 
 The family arrived in Edinburgh at the end of March 1855, 
		where they stayed in temporary accommodation at 14 Trinity Crescent, 
		which had been found for them by Dobell:
 And first of the [Massey]s, who arrived in Edinburgh eight days ago, 
		and on Monday entered upon the lodgings we had found for them at 
		Trinity—where they now seem comfortably settled.
 
 I have seen them every day, and am pleased to the heart to find in him 
		more even than I allowed myself to expect of beautiful and good ... The 
		upper part of his face reminds me of Raphael's angels, and I catch 
		myself dwelling upon him with a kind of optical fondness, as one looks 
		upon a beautiful picture or a rare colour. And this in spite of a blue 
		satin waistcoat! and a gold-coloured tie! The second morning I came upon 
		him early, sans neckerchief or collar, nursing his sickly baby, the grey 
		wrapper in which he sat, being like the mist to the morning as regards 
		his wonderful complexion, and it would be difficult to imagine more 
		marvellous (masculine) beauty …[41]
 Massey was not due to take up his post with the Edinburgh 
		News for another two months, so he busied himself then and later by 
		writing some 
		articles for Hogg's Instructor, which also formed the basis for 
		two of his future lecture subjects.  In ‘Thomas 
		Hood, Poet and Punster’, Hood's ‘Song 
		of the Shirt’ received honourable mention, continuing Massey's 
		commitment to the opposition of social injustice at that time.  He 
		referred to it as a ‘piercing cry’ that:
 woke up the wealthy and the great from their luxurious beds … that 
		showed them the human lives they were wearing out - the blood of little 
		children wrung out to dye their costly crimson … their sisters who 
		stitched their lives into their work for 4½d. per day …  some, 
		indeed, cursed the voice of the poet that had so rudely broken their 
		voluptuous dream and they slunk back to their silken pillows. But the 
		rest stared on, and could not turn away... None but the poor know what 
		the poor endure. But this song led England to see that there were, in 
		London alone, 33,500 poor women, working for from 2½d. to 5d. per day
		… [42]
 
			
				
					| 
					                 
					…O! Men, with Sisters dear!O! Men with Mothers and Wives!
 It is not linen you're wearing out,
 But human creatures' lives!
 Stitch - stitch - stitch,
 In poverty, hunger and dirt,
 Sewing at once with a double thread,
 A Shroud as well as a Shirt …[43]
 |  ‘The Poetry of Alfred 
		Tennyson’, an appreciation of Tennyson's Poems, The Princess, 
		and In Memoriam, was probably the best article he had written on 
		a living poet up to that time, and was one of the first articles to show 
		his development of prose style when divorced from political commentary:
 It is his colossal calmness, the absence of blind hurry, that is 
		often mistaken for a want of passionate earnestness … The poetry of 
		Alfred Tennyson constitutes a world of exceeding loveliness, a world of 
		peculiar beauty, unique in all literature … When his verse 'trembles and 
		sparkles as with ecstasy', it is intellectual, and not a dance of the 
		blood ... After that grand debauch with the fire-waters of Byron, which 
		we look back upon, how pure, how fresh, and sparkling with health is the 
		poetry of Tennyson! … We find that the subjectivity of our poetry is 
		representative of the time and the circumstances that produced it, as 
		the objective drama of the times of Shakspeare. In Tennyson this 
		subjectivity has its culmination …
 He was pleased with it sufficiently to send a copy to the 
		Tennysons with a covering letter to Mrs Tennyson, rather imperiously 
		requesting some personal details of her husband that he could include in 
		a sketch for Bogue:
 Dear Madam,
 In my last note I quite forgot to say that Mr. Woolner told me that Mr. 
		Tennyson had said that if I still persisted in writing the sketch for 
		the ‘Men of the Time’, he supposed he must give me the Data—or something 
		to that effect. Pray say that I do persist, and shall be glad to get it 
		at once. I enclose a Review which I wrote in a paper here. I had no Copy 
		of Mr. Tennyson's Poems at hand or I might have convicted the young 
		Gentleman on other counts …
 Yours dear Madam
 very Respectfully,
 Gerald Massey.[44]
 Emily replied and, in more gentle tone, commented on the 
		article:
 My dear Sir,
 Thank you very much for having sent us your Review.  Our Mother and 
		Aunt were so charmed with it I ordered a copy for each, and may I add I 
		too also like it extremely.  I only remember one thing with which I 
		cannot quite agree, for I cannot help looking upon my husband as among 
		the universal poets.  He is too human to be merely a subjective 
		poet and I cannot help thinking if you read his poems now as I hope you 
		will one day read them in the light of himself, if I may so speak, you 
		would agree with me.  Is not his genius both Idyllic and Lyrical? 
		the first quite as much as the last; and is not an Idyll a kind of 
		concrete drama at least in its highest form is it not so—& does not this 
		imply universality? … I hope Mrs Massey is improving as rapidly as 
		possible …
 Truly yours
 Emily Tennyson[45]
   Following this letter Tennyson wrote to Massey: 
		Farringford
 Freshwater I.W.
 July 11/55.
 Dear Mr. Massey,Will you accept a little volume from me of my own poems?  I have 
		ordered Moxon to forward one to you.  My mother now between 70 & 
		80, one who takes far more interest in the next world than in this, & 
		not generally given to the reading of literature, was quite delighted 
		with your paper in Hogg's Instructor.
 Believe me
 dear Mr Massey
 yours very truly
 A. Tennyson[46]
 The Masseys had now found more permanent accommodation at 12, 
		Henderson Row, near the Royal Botanic Garden and Edinburgh Academy, but 
		the first of several tragedies was being enacted.  Marian, the 
		Masseys' ten months old youngest daughter who had been sickly from birth 
		as mentioned by Dobell, developed enteritis, and died on 19 July.  
		Massey wrote to Emily Tennyson:
 Dear Madam,
 Our little darling's gone.  At one o'Clock this morning while the 
		world slept the death-angel dived and snatched, we think blindly, from 
		this troubled sea of life one of the purest preciousest pearls that were 
		ever set in the crown of God.
 Yours, very heartbrokenly
 Gerald Massey.[47]
 Dobell mentioned this also in a letter to Dr Samuel Brown: ‘… 
		You will be glad to know that [Massey] has got a good appointment in 
		Edinburgh.  He is in great grief just now, poor fellow, for the 
		death of his youngest child…’[48]
 
 This was a severe blow, especially to Rosina for whom it was 
		the beginning of a decade of depressive ill health.  It is not 
		certain when Rosina had commenced taking alcohol, but she certainly 
		became addicted to it during this time.  Psychologically the shock 
		must have caused traumatic hysteria with depressive conversion.  
		She suffered exaggerated physical and mental symptoms which showed 
		themselves as hyper-expression of feelings that gave episodes of 
		dramatisation, changeable moods, irritation and fits of temper.  
		Early in her illness she was queried as having tuberculosis, and later 
		as being hyperthyroid, but no firm physical diagnosis was recorded.  
		Although there were to be occasional remissions over the following ten 
		years, she remained virtually an invalid, with pathological jealousy 
		causing Massey great problems both in his working and writing life.  
		An anonymous writer in the New York Mercury gave a generally 
		inaccurate account of the Masseys, with whom he had stayed on one 
		occasion.  But he did mention Rosina's jealous reactions in the mid 
		1850's when she thought her husband was receiving approving glances from 
		attractive young women during his lectures (St 
		Louis Globe Democrat, 21 October, 1875).  To his credit, 
		when Massey could have sent her on a number of occasions to a mental 
		hospital, he looked after her with affection and always gave her 
		support.
 
 
 
		Craigcrook Castle. 
		During his first year in Edinburgh he came in contact with a 
		number of literary figures, including the poet Alexander Smith who was 
		secretary to the University, Professor John Blackie of the University, 
		John Buckle, historian, and Professor James Simpson, the discoverer of 
		the anaesthetic properties of chloroform.  Simpson also advised 
		treatment for Massey's wife, without charge.  But it was William 
		Stirling, MP for Perth, referred to as ‘That princely Stirling of Keir’ 
		who befriended Massey with a generosity that was typical of his 
		practical and sympathetic personality.  Stirling owned Craigcrook 
		Castle, at Keir, some three miles from Edinburgh.  Dating from the 
		14th century and enlarged in the early 1800s, it was originally a large 
		manor house with a round tower and extensive grounds.[49]  
		Stirling willingly placed the castle grounds at the family's disposal.  
		But now Massey was feeling trapped by his job which he found to be 
		mentally exhausting as well as taking up more of his time than he had 
		anticipated.  Hopes of financial security ended when he was forced 
		to employ a resident housekeeper to look after Rosina and the children 
		when he was at work, and he found himself getting poorer by the month.  
		To give Rosina a change of surroundings he arranged for a short holiday 
		at the Bridge of Allan, but even this had to be curtailed due to the 
		illness of one of his children.  To add to his problems Rosina was 
		well into another pregnancy, complaining that she found Edinburgh too 
		cold and wanted to return south.  All those factors so restricted 
		his time that he could undertake only a small amount of extra writing.  
		His next book of poems, Craigcrook 
		Castle, for which he over-optimistically expected to receive £200 if 
		it sold well, was consequently delayed.  That extended venture into 
		blank verse included ‘The 
		Mother's Idol Broken’, an elegy on the death of Marian with a theme 
		similar to ‘Babe 
		Christabel’.  However, Massey's depressing personal experience 
		increased his fault of excessive sentiment almost to the point of 
		morbidity which, by today's standards, makes the poem uncomfortable 
		reading:
 
			
				
					| 
					…She only caught three words of human speech:
 One for her Mother, one for me, and one
 She crowed with, for the fields, and open heaven.
 That last she sighed with a sweet farewell pathos
 A minute ere she left the house of life,
 To come for kisses never any more …
 Ere the soul loosed from its last ledge of life,
 Her little face peered round with anxious eyes,
 Then, seeing all the old faces, dropt content...
 
 Within a mile of Edinburgh Town
 We laid our little darling down;
 Our first seed in God's acre sown! …
 
 Today, when winds of winter blow,
 And Nature sits in dream of snow,
 With Ugolino-look of woe:
 
 Wife from the window came to me,
 Now leaves were fallen she could see
 The little wee grave thro' shred elm-tree …
 
 Think of our babe that will never wake,
 And hold your own till fond hearts ache,
 Sweet souls, for little Marian's sake …
 |  At that time the family was very fortunate in having made the 
		acquaintance of William Stirling, who generously loaned them money on 
		account to pay for the services of their housekeeper, and gave them 
		gifts of game from his estate.
 
 Their next child, Sidney William Dobell, named after the 
		poet, was born on 7 May 1856 with a fate similar to Marian's, and some 
		four months later Dobell had again to write of bad news: ‘… Death 
		is again going up poor Massey's long stair, I fear; my little namesake 
		was nearly dying when I saw him last.’[50]  
		Little Sidney died of peritonitis on 10 September, placing another grave 
		in Warriston Cemetery and causing Rosina more mental trauma, especially 
		as the cemetery could be seen from the family's rooms.
 
 
 
 
		Warriston Cemetery (Ref. No 147, Section N, Sub-Section 
		N2, Inner Row 04).Photos: Chris Halliday.
 
		 Some 
		additional unsigned writing was contracted for Hugh Miller's newspaper 
		the Witness, for which there is positive identification of a 
		series of eleven articles from May to September 1857, covering the 
		Manchester Art Treasures Exhibition.[51]  Breaks 
		in the series were made in order to give more coverage to the Crimean 
		war.  As an example of Massey's descriptive prose writing it is 
		among his best works, apart from his common fault of over extended 
		sentences.  Yet even that has a subjective illustrative power in 
		its own right, reminiscent of, but antithetical to, Dickens' colourful 
		objective sketches.  During the train journey to Manchester he 
		noted:
 One whiff of Spring fragrance and we are whirled into Preston.  
		O, town of the multitude of tall chimneys, that reek continually in the 
		face of heaven! it is pleasant to behold thee receiving the nightly 
		baptism of God's cleansing air;—to see the arms of old grey space flung 
		around those lofty soot-fountains, and choking them, as it were, for a 
		short time, that have daily choked the air for so long;—to feel the hand 
		of silence laid on the perturbed spirit of machinery, while it lies like 
		a tired thing at rest.  Gladly also do we again shoot out into the 
		country, away from those towering stacks and clanging mills that will be 
		all alive two hours hence, and clamouring at heaven, like so many 
		frustrated Babels, that all end in smoke; for we get the prettiest of 
		peeps of little nooks, where the lilac is all one mass of starry purple 
		bloom, and the fruit trees look like a winged shower of white.  We 
		take in a good long breath of the sweet country air, as a diver does 
		before he makes his plunge, and, lo! we are in Manchester … [52]
 
 
 
		Medal 
		showing the front of the Manchester Art Treasures Exhibition Building. 
 
 
		The Nave of the Manchester Art Treasures Exhibition 
		Building(Illustrated Times, 11 June 1857).
 The large exhibition provided a sampling of all aspects of 
		art, with paintings particularly well represented, hanging in long 
		galleries.  Most of Massey's articles were descriptions of these 
		works, and he wrote colourful vignettes of the painters, and stories of 
		the subjects that would have supplemented the published brochures to 
		advantage:
 Shapes of grace have started from their marble immurement at the 
		sculptor's wakening touch, and taken their stand on pedestals by the way 
		… rich tapestries and fairy traceries … fruit dishes, starred and bossed 
		with jewels of price … common wood, carved with such art, you might 
		fancy it budded into life in that shape, and put forth those tendrils 
		and leaves that are only waiting for the juices of spring to flow …[53]
 In spite of his dislike of newspaper work, it had developed 
		his prose writing away from the reflected, often excessively emotional, 
		subjectivism that remained a feature in his verse.  There was 
		greater control and refinement of composition, with increasing critical 
		discernment.  Without that experience, favourable literary 
		appreciation for his main prose works soon to follow would have been 
		considerably weakened.
 |