| 
  
  
    
      | [Back 
		to Chapter 3]
 
 
 PART 2
 
 QUEST
 
 ――――♦――――
 
 CHAPTER 4
 
 PRIVATION
 
 [1856-1863]
 |  
      | 
        
        
          
            | 
        Poverty is a never ceasing struggle for 
		the means of living and is a cold place to write poetry in. 
		
		(Massey) |  |  
      | 
        
 The difficulties with which Massey had to contend since his move to 
		Edinburgh continued with two serious disappointments between the latter 
		part of 1856 and early 1857.  Due to increasing competition between 
		the Edinburgh newspapers, the proprietor of the Edinburgh News 
		was forced to reduce his expenses, and Massey was made redundant.
         Unable now to afford a housekeeper, he and Rosina had to do 
		all the work themselves.  This was not helped by Rosina taking to 
		her bed at times, due to acute depression.  Again the Stirlings 
		helped by providing coal for heating and some clothing for Christabel, 
		then aged 5 yrs.
 
        12 Henderson Road
 Thursday
 Dear Mrs Stirling.I send you one Pound, out of the first money I have received, toward 
		repaying the two Pounds you were good enough to lend me for my Rent.  
		The other I hope to send in a day or two.  I would have called on 
		you but for some time past have scarcely left the house for various 
		reasons.  One has been that I and Mrs. Massey have done the 
		housework between us for the last two months and Mrs. Massey has been 
		quite laid up in bed during the last week, so that I have had all the 
		work to do.
 
 If it was you, as we suspect it was, who sent us half a Ton of Coal 
		recently, we do not know how to thank you sufficiently, for we had none 
		in the house and had not had any for two days.  So you may guess 
		they were welcome.  Mrs. Massey called to try and thank you, but 
		you were engaged.  We are indebted also to some anonymous 
		providence for a handsome new dress for Christabel, but do not know 
		whether it be you or not.  If so, and if not, God bless you for all 
		your kindnesses.
 And believe meYours [affectionately]
 Gerald Massey
 
        Additionally, Craigcrook Castle, 
		on which he had placed so much hope and hurried to complete, had been 
		published in October, dedicated to William Stirling.  Early sales 
		of the book went quite well, prompting a second revised edition which 
		then fell flat.  Fraser's Magazine criticised his war verses 
		in general and accounts of battle in particular, referring especially to 
		the section ‘Glimpses 
		of the War’:[1]
 Mr Massey was thinking of the jolly excitement of a rush of six 
		hundred horsemen with plumes waving, sabres high in the air, trumpets 
		blowing the charge, horses neighing, and the spectators cheering on the 
		gallant race. Did Mr Massey ever ride a steeple-chase, or did he ever 
		see one ridden? Let him ask one of the riders what he thinks ... if they 
		tell him that they have any thoughts to expend upon glory ... Mr Massey 
		has far too much talent not to perceive at once that his poem, put into 
		the mouth of a cavalry soldier charging at Balaklava, is a ludicrous 
		absurdity … We are not criticising his poem except from one point 
		of view—its utter falsity of representation …[2]
 This was the second review, following his earlier
		War Waits, that had criticised his 
		battle scenes.  Some years later, after meeting an officer who had 
		taken part in the heavy cavalry charge at Balaklava, Massey recast this 
		previously criticised epic, and presented it in a less turgid style to
		Cassell's Magazine as ‘Scarlett's 
		Three Hundred’.[3]
 
 The blank verse poem ‘Craigcrook 
		Castle’ by itself received favourable comments—Henry Fothergill 
		Chorley writing in the Athenæum 
		cited a "richly-coloured evening picture":
 
			
				
					| 
					Now Sunset burns.   A sea of gold on fire
 Serenely surges around purple isles:
 
 O'er billows and flame-furrows Day goes down.
 Far-watching clouds with ruby glimmer bloom …
 |  But this perceptive reviewer noted the haste in which Massey 
		had completed his book, and commented that ‘the framework in which these 
		things are set has been carelessly or infelicitously contrived.’[4]  
		In letters to William Stirling, Massey wrote acknowledging the deficits:
 What you say about my being too Imagerial and wordy is alas too true.  
		I feel deeply all that can be urged against my verse including the hard 
		words in Fraser and I trust that that is one step toward amendment.  
		But somehow I feel much more from what my kindly Reviewers have not said 
		and I felt they might have said than I do from the harshness of those 
		who assume to set me and matters right … A Note from my Publisher by 
		which I am reminded that Craigcrook Castle is not the only castle 
		I have built in the air.  Among the hopes I had formed upon its 
		anticipated success was the hope that I might be enabled to return you 
		the money you so generously lent me in my need.  Many other hopes 
		and plans for the future must likewise fall to the ground. I had thought 
		that my Book might have got me out of debt and left a little to live on 
		while I might do something else more worthy.  But altho' the sale 
		of the Book cannot surely be quite over, it is quite evident that it 
		won't redeem me, and I must look to other means. I suppose the principal 
		cause of this failure—i.e. compared with my wants—lies in the immature 
		state of the poems and the haste in which they were written and printed.  
		Their reception has been pretty good but I suppose the public feel 
		disappointed and do not care to buy.  What I am to do for the 
		future I don't know.  My peculiar domestic circumstances sadly 
		drain on my health and time.  I am getting so little master of 
		either that I don't believe I can earn a living by my pen … I have 
		generally been pretty hopeful but I often feel that I am, and shall be, 
		dragged down before I can get a foothold on the world to do something 
		worth having lived for … We have thought of going back to London as we 
		have nothing to keep us here except being near Prof. Simpson … We have 
		lost two of our little ones here and my Wife clings to them, altho' she 
		thinks her health might be better in England.  I feel darkly that 
		the next two or three years will be the most critical of all.  God 
		help me through them.[5]
 Since the American issue of ‘Babe Christabel’, Massey had 
		been soliciting to have his latest poems including ‘Craigcrook Castle’ 
		incorporated into a new revised edition.  The next year by 
		arrangement with his previous publisher, Ticknor and Fields of Boston 
		issued his collected works as The Poetical Works of Gerald Massey, 
		although the format of this did not please him, and he wrote to the 
		publishers:
 I have received a copy of your edition of my Poems … The Book is 
		exquisitely got up for a popular pocket poet which I hope some day to 
		become.  But for the life of me I can't understand why Derby's Ed. 
		should have been reprinted from with all its shortcomings and 
		imperfections when there was a fifth Ed of Babe Christabel 
		revised and enlarged three years ago in England.  It contained 
		several other lyrics, and the arrangement of the poems was improved.  
		Then, unfortunately, you have reprinted the first Ed of Craigcrook 
		Castle instead of the 2nd which I sent both to Derby and you …  
		Many of Derby's mistakes were awful.  He made 56 in printing from a 
		printed Copy … I used to write gossiping letters for the Tribune, but on 
		taking an Editorship in Edinburgh the Correspondence dropped … 
		[6]
 During that difficult time and for the following ten years 
		Massey had good cause to be grateful to Hepworth Dixon.  He had 
		been sending Dixon copies of his books for reviewing, as well as 
		pre-publication ‘flyers’.[7]  Because of Dixon's 
		continued interest in him and his poetry, early in 1857 Massey had 
		gained a foothold in the Athenæum as a poetry reviewer, to which 
		he contributed fifty three reviews by the end of that first year.  
		This enforced reading probably gave him ideas for a series of lectures 
		during the coming winter.  His prospectus of ten subjects at four 
		guineas a lecture included Pre-Raphaelitism in Poetry and Painting, The 
		Principle and Practice of Association, Robert Burns and Love Poetry, The 
		Spasmodic School and its Critics, and Leaves from the Life of the Poor.
 
 Sydney Dobell noted these, and wrote to the Reverend J. B. 
		Paton:
 G. M[assey] intends, this winter, to give a course of Lectures, 
		through England and Scotland, and has sent me his prospectus.  If 
		you have influence with any of the Sheffield Institutions, I know you 
		will be glad to get him an engagement, and so have the opportunity of 
		making his personal acquaintance.  I am anxious that he should get 
		as many fixtures as possible, because the profession of lecturer would 
		be so much more favourable to his poetical studies than that incessant 
		newspaper and magazine writing which now exhausts his time and brains 
		. . . [8]
 Although hoping to travel further south during his tour, he 
		appears to have remained in Scotland and the north of England for that 
		season.  On 20 November 1857, Massey wrote from his address at 12 
		Henderson Row, concerning a series of lectures he had arranged there and 
		in Sunderland:
 [Envelope addressed to:
 Robt. S. Watson Esq
 10 Royal Arcade
 Newcastle on Tyne]
 12 Henderson RowEdinburgh
 20 November 1857
 Dear Sir,
 Much obliged for the Letters.  Could you send me a Copy of the 
		announcement you mention? also if Mr. Maclean says anything in Friday’s
		Chronicle will you be good enough to ask him, from me, for a 
		Copy.  I have engaged those busy B's you name to give 3 lectures in 
		Newcastle and 3 in Sunderland for £40 the 6.  I think Sunderland 
		may somewhat nullify the Success which they anticipate in Newcastle.  
		Will you remember us very kindly to your Father and Mother and Sisters 
		and Cousin Willie and also our primal Quaker friends who made a bit of 
		Sunshine for us in that particularly shady place Newcastle in its 
		November shroud.  I send a Copy of my last Book*—corrected Edition 
		per same post.  Mrs Massey has been very poorly since we came home 
		and has not been able yet to redeem her promise of writing She desires 
		me to convey all affectionate regards to your Sisters.
 Yours faithfully
 Gerald Massey
 * Craigcrook Castle. Ed.
 Three lectures commenced on 25 January 1858 at the Nelson 
		Street Lecture Room, Newcastle upon Tyne.  Sir John Fife took the 
		chair for the first, ‘The Poetry of Hood, and Wit and Humour’.  
		Although the series was well received, the hall was never completely 
		filled:
 Mr Massey has a happy knack of saying good things pleasantly, and 
		this talent the subject of the lecture enabled him to display to the 
		best advantage, and though his definitions were a little elaborated and 
		most of his jokes well known, the audience appeared to be delighted 
		…[9]
 The Border Record reported one lecture given earlier to the 
		Galashiels Mechanics Institution on the Poetry of Tennyson, saying:
 The most exciting part of the lecture was that contrasting the poetry 
		of Byron with the poetry of Tennyson.  The one, he said, was like 
		‘light from heaven’, the other like ‘sparks from hell’.  Continuing 
		in this strain for some time, and throwing his whole soul into his 
		anathemas against the writings of Byron, a few admirers of that poet 
		gave vent to their feelings in no unmistakable signs of disapprobation 
		…[10]
 The following month was notable politically for the collapse 
		of Palmerston's ministry, the main cause of which was an attempt to 
		please his ally, Napoleon III.  Napoleon had complained that a plot 
		to murder him had been devised in England, and ordered Palmerston to 
		alter the law to ensure against future conspiracies.  An attempt 
		had indeed been made on the life of the emperor, a bomb having been 
		thrown under his carriage when he was returning from the opera on 14 
		January.  The attack was credited to the work of Félice Orsini, an 
		Italian radical, who judged Napoleon to be a traitor in not supporting 
		the Italian revolutionary cause.
 
 Unwisely, Palmerston acceded to Napoleon's demand with the 
		Conspiracy to Murder Bill.  This caused considerable opposition, 
		and pressure on the government was increased following the publication 
		by Edward Truelove of a pamphlet written by
		W. E. Adams, Tyrannicide: 
		is it Justifiable?   Truelove was arrested and 
		proceedings commenced on charges of seditious libel and the incitement 
		of diverse people to assassinate the emperor.  A committee of 
		defence was formed, and protest meetings held throughout the country.  
		On 23 February Massey was to have addressed a rally in Newcastle 
		presided over by Joseph Cowen, supporter of radicals who was later to 
		acquire the Newcastle Chronicle, but the bill had been defeated 
		the previous Friday and Palmerston was forced to resign.  Those 
		present at the meeting were told by Henry Buckle that Mr Massey was very 
		unwell; but besides that, not having been in town for the last few days, 
		he had concluded that after what took place in the House of Commons on 
		Friday night, the meeting would not be held, and he had therefore made 
		other arrangements; otherwise it was his full intention to have been 
		present on this occasion.[11]  In a letter to 
		the meeting Massey had written:
 Allow me also to rejoice that a sufficient number of Englishmen were 
		found true to the national spirit to give that significant hint to 
		Continental despotism which was given in the House of Commons last 
		Friday night.  I have never believed that the heart of this famous 
		English people was with the corrupt and bloody despotisms that only 
		govern a nation by piecemeal murder.  Now, I wish that our country 
		should be on the best of terms with France.  France, mind—the 
		people of France—the heart and intellect of France. But then, Louis 
		Napoleon is not France … he has had the power and prestige of an 
		alliance with England—he has murdered and expatriated thousands of 
		Frenchmen, whose only crime lay in their patriotism... It is to be hoped 
		that Lord Palmerston's ‘bubble of reputation’ for national spirit and 
		love of liberty has burst for ever …
 The letter was read by Cowan, and repeatedly applauded by the 
		audience, who cheered most loudly at the close.[12]  
		The new Derby government did not press the charges against Truelove; a 
		return of not guilty was made prior to the trial which had been fixed 
		for June, and he was acquitted.
 |    
	 
	The French Colonel's Bill. A Broadsheet(Newcastle City Libraries)
 
		
			
				| 
				Massey was able to write only one article during 1858. ‘Poetry—The 
				Spasmodists’ was published in February, and showed that he 
				did not align himself totally with that style of poetry, 
				demonstrated in particular by Dobell's ‘Balder’:
 A poet should be a seeker and a finder of the truth and 
				beauty that lie in realities around him, rather than a producer 
				of beauty out of the deeps of his own personality.  What 
				constitutes spasm, but weakness trying to be strong, and 
				collapsing in the effort … Mr Dobell appears to select his 
				subject, and the point of treatment, for their remoteness from 
				all ordinary reality, and then to refine upon these until they 
				are intangible to us … We urge a return to the lasting and true 
				subject matter of poetry, and a firmer reliance on primal truths 
				… As Realists, we do not forget that it is not in the vulgarity 
				of common things, nor the mediocrity of average characters, nor 
				the familiarity of familiar affairs, nor the everydayness of 
				everyday lives, that the poetry consists … but those universal 
				powers and passions which he shares with heroes and martyrs, are 
				the true subjects of poetry … We must have poetry for men who 
				work, and think, and suffer, and whose hearts would feel faint 
				and their souls grow lean if they fed on such fleeting 
				deliciousness and confectionery trifle as the spasmodists too 
				frequently offer them …[13]
 
				At the end of March, Massey concluded his series of Edinburgh 
				lectures at the Queen Street Hall by returning to familiar 
				subjects.  In ‘Thomas Hood, and Wit and Humour’, Massey 
				expressed the view that Hood's humour was of the most ethereal 
				kind—neither coarse, like Swift's, nor sarcastic like 
				Byron's—his wit being anchored fast in humanity.  The 
				Scotsman on the 24 March 1858 reported that the lecture 
				was received by a large audience who frequently applauded and 
				gave a hearty vote of thanks at the conclusion.  The 
				Scotsman followed with a report on the 27 March of Massey's 
				‘The Poetry of Alfred Tennyson’, which Massey greatly admired.  
				His views on the Laureate’s verse—they met once—are interesting
				…
 On Thursday evening [25th], Mr Gerald Massey gave the last of 
				his series of lectures in Queen Street Hall [Edinburgh], the 
				subject being ‘The Poetry of Alfred Tennyson.’  Lord Murray 
				presided.
 
 Mr Massey, by way of introduction, glanced 
				at the two divisions of Poetry—the objective and the subjective. 
				Tennyson came under the subjective class. By beginning his 
				poetry with minute and careful particularising—not like those 
				who broadly handled the brush and produced effects not to be 
				desired—his reputation was slowly and securely built.
 
 Many people pretended to view his poetry unfavourably—they 
				thought it was vague, involved and meaningless.  However, 
				Tennyson never "moved with aimless feet."  His verse was 
				pregnant with meaning, and though at times subtle and obscure at 
				first sight, this vagueness occurred only when the poet reached 
				one of those eternal truths which, like a cut diamond, might be 
				six-sided, and present as many meanings.  The stream of his 
				speech might be deep—perhaps unfathomable to many—but it was 
				never muddy, except through the splashings and founderings of 
				the reader.  The great function of the poet was to give 
				expression to the beautiful; and surely, he did well who 
				translated a page of that language.
 
 Tennyson's poetry was a world of beauty—not a world like 
				Wordsworth's with the look of eternity in its aspect; not like 
				Shelly's, so fantastic, so aspiring in its forms; not like 
				Keats's, whose deity was Pan, who revelled in a wilderness of 
				sweets, where the very weeds were fragrant; nor like Byron's, 
				which was a volcano extinct.  Tennyson's world was like 
				that fairer world of beauty of which they got glimpses only in 
				the delectable views of the imagination.  It lay near 
				heaven. It had a holy ground. It might be an invisible world to 
				some, but others could glance up at it.  It was a world 
				where the mortal met with the immortal, and saw the spirits of 
				the past move by grandly and solemnly, with music perfect and 
				ineffable, dying away into the faintest spirit-sweetness, 
				seeming to be answered by an ethereal far-off echo in the life 
				that is to come.
 
 The lecturer showed that it required a refined and educated 
				taste to appreciate the poetry of Tennyson, which was noble, 
				moral, and pure, having a womanly sanctity pervading it.
 
 He contrasted it with the poetry of Byron, noticing how the 
				latter was sunk in self-consciousness, while the former was 
				patriotic and representing humanity.  He gave several 
				readings from the more prominent of Tennyson's poems, and 
				especially quoted from his In Memoriam.  He 
				considered that it possessed so wide a range of thought and 
				beauty in its expression that he could not but consider it as 
				the greatest poetic effort of the last two hundred years—the 
				climax and crown of Tennyson's poetic life, to be equalled by 
				nothing he had yet done or would hereafter perform.
 
				Massey's life with Rosina was becoming an increasing problem.  
				Continually agitating to get away from Edinburgh, her frequent 
				mood changes together with symptoms of illness that often 
				confined her to bed, eventually forced Massey to move.  
				Very depressed, he wrote to Stirling in March:
 I have determined on leaving Edinburgh this spring and I 
				expect to take a little place in England near Hertford right in 
				the Country.  Rent 20£ but I find that with all my 
				Lecturing efforts and planning I shall run short of 20£ or so to 
				leave here honourably and get there safely.  Whether I can 
				honourably and safely appeal to you for that amount I am 
				doubtful and am really ashamed to do so after all your kindness 
				but I don't know what else to do.  My Lectures are over for 
				this year and I have drawn on all my writing resources to the 
				utmost penny to get clear of and pay the large expenses of 
				moving our things a distance of 420 miles and still fall short.  
				I must trust to Lecturing for a Winter or two until I get my 
				next Book done—a sort of Autobiography— but the Summer will be 
				my difficulty … I am poor enough if you only knew it.  In 
				Lecturing even I cannot leave my Wife at home she is not fit to 
				be left.  Her head is sure to go bad when she is left alone 
				…[14]
 
				Prior to his move, Massey prepared a list of lectures that he 
				proposed delivering to Associations and Mechanics Institutes 
				during the rest of the year.  In The Scotsman, 
				24 March, 1858, were advertised the following:
 
				A course of Six Lectures on our chief living Poets.
 Cromwell and the Commonwealth.
 The Poetry of Wordsworth, and its influence on the Age.
 The Ideal of Democracy.
 The Ballad Poetry of Ireland and Scotland.
 Thomas Carlyle and his writings.
 Russell Lowell, the American Poet, his Poems and Bigelow Papers.
 Shakespeare - his Genius, Age, and Contemporaries.
 The Prose and Poetry of the Rev. Chas. Kingsley.
 The Age of Shams and Era of Humbug.
 The Sonz-literature of Germany and Hungary.
 Phrenology, the Science of Human Nature.
 The Life, Genius and Poetry of Shelley.
 On the necessity of Cultivating the Imagination.
 American Literature, with pictures of transatlantic Authors.
 Burns, and the Poets of the People.
 The curse of Competition and the beauty of Brotherhood.
 John Milton: his Character, Life and Genius.
 Genius, Talent and Tact, with illustrations from among living
 notables.
 The Hero as the Worker, with illustrious instance of the Toiler 
				as the
 Teacher.
 Mirabeau, a Life History.
 On the effects of Physical and mental Impressions.
  The family's removal from Edinburgh to Hertfordshire, 
				which they hoped would ease their domestic strain, proved yet 
				again to be unfortunate.  An account of their arrival was 
				sent to Stirling on 6 June 1858:
 Mount Pleasant
 Monk's Green
 Nr Hoddesden
 Herts.
 … I have managed to take the four-hundred-and-twenty-mile leap 
				in the dark and alighted here three miles from Broxbourne 
				Station about pennyless with a great deal of our furniture 
				smashed in coming and wanting mending … I have got the farmhouse 
				of a Gentleman who does not live on his farm who lets me house 
				and garden for £20 Rent and taxes … It may be thought that when 
				I ask 5 guineas per Lecture in a public advertisement I am 
				pretty well off—but I am compelled to take my Wife with me 
				wherever I go, which as you may imagine makes my expenses 
				threefold—but this is quite necessary.  I could not leave 
				her at home with the Children … [15]
 
				For the ensuing five years Rosina was to make Massey's winter 
				lecturing tours, when they took place, a fearful but necessary 
				ordeal.  Obliged on occasions to take her with him, he did 
				find it possible at times to promote her as giving recitations 
				of his poetry.  These were well reported by the press, 
				saying that she read with exquisite taste and quiet power, but 
				many indispositions made her appearance at times quite 
				unpredictable.  Thomas Cooper, who had kept an interested 
				eye on Massey's writing since he left the Chartist movement, was 
				less understanding about his domestic difficulties.  He 
				wrote to Thomas Chambers on the 22nd August 1861:
 … Mrs. Cooper seems young again!  She runs after the 
				wild flowers with the elasticity of a girl & the rapt enjoyment 
				of a child!
 
 Of such a wife a Poet might sing; but I wonder that poor Gerald 
				Massey parades the figure of the drunken plague to whom he is so 
				sillily tied himself … [16]
 |  
				
  
	List of lectures. 
		
			
				| 
				Robert Burns' centenary fell on 25 January 1859.  To 
				honour this event the directors of the Crystal Palace Company 
				organised a special poetry 
				competition with a winner's prize of fifty guineas.  
				Massey was quick to respond, as did 620 other entrants, but he 
				failed to win the prize.  This was awarded to
				Miss Isa Craig, a contributor 
				of verse to The Scotsman under the pen-name ‘Isa’.  
				There were 14,000 people present for the reading of her prize 
				poem.  However, the judges, Richard Monckton Milnes MP for 
				Pontefract and prominent literary figure, Tom Taylor, author, 
				playwright and one time editor of Punch, together with 
				Theodore Martin, author and translator of literature, 
				recommended that the first six be published.  Massey was 
				placed fourth in merit, and his entry 
				Robert Burns: A Centenary 
				Song was published in March.[17]
 
 The reviews which referred also to some political items on 
				Palmerston that Massey had included in the book, were later to 
				cause him some concern. 
				James Macfarlan had also entered the competition [Robert 
				Burns: A Centenary Ode], but was unplaced.
 
 For some time a number of friends had been suggesting that he 
				should make an application to the government to be placed on 
				their Civil Pension List.  This had not been proceeded 
				with, due to Massey's political views that had received 
				considerable attention in previous years.  However, with a 
				change of government, he considered it now to be worth 
				attempting.
 
 His decision was strengthened by the press, which had 
				recently suggested such a step when they commented: ‘We are 
				sorry to hear that calamity has been busy in Mr Massey's 
				household, and that he is now struggling sorely to keep the wolf 
				from the door … The bounty of the Crown … would allow him to 
				give more time to his productions …’  They concluded rather 
				pointedly with a phrase that must have made Massey wince, ‘It 
				might also have the effect of making him a little more discreet 
				in the expression of his political opinions.’  William 
				Stirling promised to make Massey's request known to Lord John 
				Manners, then in the Earl of Derby's Cabinet.
 
 As if to mitigate to some extent the loss of not winning the 
				Burns competition, he was informed that the government, on the 
				plea of Stirling, had granted him a gift of £100.  His 
				wife, not knowing what to do, had a good cry, assuming that this 
				would solve their debt and other financial commitments.  
				This it did, but only temporarily, and he had to turn again to 
				Stirling for assistance.  Becoming in arrears with his rent 
				and having failed to get any of his lectures published, he had 
				offered a journal editor some of his poems for £20 and not 
				received the money.  Stirling dealt with the legal affair, 
				which was resolved satisfactorily, but Massey was left with the 
				expenses.  In February 1860 he was called away from a 
				lecture tour:
 On getting home I find my Wife too ill to have written … I 
				was sent for home as they thought her dying.  I think she 
				may perhaps tide over her present attack but she is very ill.  
				And our present circumstances are enough to turn the scales 
				against her.  We have to leave here this month and as I 
				have a house offered to me in the Lake District, and as the 
				Doctor thinks a change as soon as possible the only chance of 
				getting my Wife out of her morbid mental condition, I think of 
				going there if I can anyhow clear off to go, and raise enough 
				money to move with but how to do it I don't know for my 
				law-affair and this illness will break my back in a money sense 
				for some months to come … [18]
 
				Before he left he wrote to Harney, who was then living in 
				Jersey and editing the Jersey Independent, hinting at his 
				availability for lecturing:
 … The Bearer of this is a poor unfortunate Brother of mine 
				whom Poverty has driven into the Army . . . He never was able to 
				look after himself has worked and starved on and off for 
				years—and perhaps a year or two in the Army may do him some 
				good.  I thought that you would be able to speak a word of 
				cheer to him in a place where he knows no one.  I dare say 
				he will remember you—and that you would do this for Auld Lang 
				Syne … Perhaps some day I may get invited to your place in my 
				Lecturing capacity … [19]
 
				In all Massey's writings and letters he never makes reference 
				to any of his brothers by name.  In his poem 
				Our Heroes he 
				mentions:
 
					
						
							| 
							I had a gallant Brother, loved at home, and dear 
							to me—
 I have a mourning Mother, winsome Wife, and Children 
							three—
 He lies with Balaklava's dead …
 |  
				but none of his brothers is listed in published Crimean war 
				deaths in battle.[20]
 
 The house to which the family moved, ‘Brantwood,’ overlooking 
				Lake Coniston, was owned by his friend ‘Spartacus’ of earlier 
				Chartist days, W. J. Linton.  
				A wood engraver and former contributor of poems and articles to 
				Harney's papers, he had in 1849, together with Thornton Hunt, 
				commenced the weekly radical Leader with G. H. Lewes as 
				literary editor.  But no sooner had the family moved to 
				Brantwood, than Massey found that circumstances appeared as 
				usual to conspire against any form of successful literary 
				endeavours.  The first incident occurred on the family's 
				arrival at Coniston railway station, several miles from 
				Brantwood, when he found that he had insufficient money to 
				redeem the furniture, which had to remain at the station.  
				At that time he hoped to be able to furnish some rooms in the 
				property, which he could sub-let in the summer months and make a 
				good profit.  The second incident followed a three week 
				lecture tour, for which he received four five pound notes.  
				He had managed to clear his furniture from the station, but 
				still remained in debt.  During his absence an attempt had 
				been made to distrain on his furniture, which appeared to be the 
				only items of value he possessed.  As he was about to 
				enclose some of the money ready to post, his children who were 
				playing near him and asking for various pieces of paper, took 
				them with some other loose sheets, and put them on the fire!
 
 Fortunately William Sterling was again able to help out and 
				Massey, very dispirited, wrote glumly that not much choice was 
				given to him in anything that he did, and that his circumstances 
				at times placed him in a position that was as painful to him, as 
				perhaps appeared unaccountable to other people.  The only 
				things he could rely on were his lectures during the winter 
				months, and these were frequently interrupted from home.  
				In this situation, he again considered the possibility of being 
				placed on the government pension list, although as he mentioned 
				to Stirling, he felt strongly against any appeal being made 
				personally to Lord Palmerston, again in power with a Liberal 
				Government, as he had no faith in him politically.  In a 
				second letter he reiterated his doubts, due this time to his 
				previous literary indiscretion:
 When writing to you about Lord Palmerston, I quite forgot 
				that I had written about him in my last publication, and the 
				Saturday Review quotes it as very funny.[21] 
				The fun to them would be death to me, I expect with regard to 
				any chance with his Lordship and friends.  I don't suppose 
				he reads my verses but I suppose they all see the Saturday 
				Review … [22]
 
				That journal had reviewed his Robert Burns: A Centenary 
				Song and Other Lyrics not entirely favourably.  While 
				acknowledging his eye for external beauty, his ear for melody 
				and an appreciation of feeling and grace, it denied him 
				possession of fancy or facility.  It considered that 
				Socialist and Chartist poetry was too narrow in thought, and his 
				poetical faculty debased by a selfish view of social relations; 
				but that he still might win an abiding place in literature if he 
				would leave off politics.  Despite these criticisms, the 
				Review did consider that his poem 'Old 
				Harlequin Pam' was yet more amusing than the other political 
				silhouettes in Craigcrook Castle's 'Glimpses 
				of the War'.  In these poems he had made allusions to 
				Czar Nicholas, Napoleon and Palmerston.  Nicholas had been 
				referred to as a statue of Satan, looking down on a drooling and 
				mumbling British Lion ineffectually wagging its tail.  But 
				in Massey's poem, 'Nicholas and 
				the British Lion', the Lion has some particularly sharp 
				teeth that it uses, when Czar Nicholas dares to thrust his head 
				in its mouth, to bite it off [23]:
 
					
						
							| 
							… And the poor old beast, at whose aspect mild
 The meanest thing dared rail,
 Shakes his mane like a Conqueror's bloody plumes,
 And—quietly wags his tail …
 |  
				But the poem on Palmerston was far less subtle:
 
					
						
							| … In an Age of Sham,
 Our greatest of Humbugs is Harlequin Pam.
 Humbug in riches it reeks and rolls,
 Humbug in luxury lazily lolls,
 Humbug in Senate and Humbug in Shop,
 Humbug makes sweet the Assassin's last drop;
 And Pam, Pam is the King of all Sham,
 Our greatest of Men must be Harlequin Pam.
 England, this is the Man for you,
 The 'Times' says so, and it must be true …
 |  |    
	 
	Brantwood. (Picturesque Europe, Appleton, N.Y., 1875). 
		
			
				| 
				During his short stay at Brantwood, he wrote one article for 
				the North British Review on ‘American 
				Humour’.[24]  Most of his published 
				articles were based on lectures delivered during the winter 
				months, when not interrupted by his wife's illness.  In 
				this article he argued that humour preceded wit, the former 
				commencing with the practical joke that deals with outward 
				things, the nature of the action, and reaches both the educated 
				and uneducated.  Wit is concerned more with the quality of 
				thoughts, and is more artificial, being culturally connected 
				with a more complex state of society.  He considered that 
				the greatest of all American humorists was James Lowell, whose 
				Biglow Papers reminded him of the lusty strength and boundless 
				humour of great Elizabethan literature.
 
 Commencing in March 1860 he wrote a series of poetical 
				contributions for Charles Dickens' magazine All the Year 
				Round.  Five signed poems were published up to August, 
				with three unsigned from August to November, for which he hoped 
				to be paid ten guineas each.  But in a letter from Dickens' 
				assistant William Wills to Massey, Dickens had considered that 
				as the copyright was available to Massey after a reasonable 
				time, following publication in All the Year Round, the 
				sum of £50 in total was fair.  ‘… You will, I hope, believe 
				on reflection that the fifty pounds is a fair and just 
				remuneration for the advantage we derive from them.  If you 
				do think so, we may at this moment cry, "quits!"…’[25]  
				Massey also contributed 30 poems to Alexander Strahan's Good 
				Words magazine from October 1860 to April 1872, and poems 
				and epigrams to Cassell's Magazine and Punch in 
				the early to mid 1870s.
 
 By the spring of 1861 the family had made another move, 
				probably finding that Coniston was too isolated and inconvenient 
				for the travelling necessary for Massey's lectures.  
				Accommodation was taken in the High Street, Rickmansworth, 
				between Basing House—built in 1740 on the site of William Penn's 
				house—and the National School House.
 
 Massey's next book, published in April 1861, was 
				Havelock's March and Other 
				Poems, based on the revolt of the Indian Bengal Army.  
				Sir Henry Havelock's ‘Army of Retribution’ march for the relief 
				of Cawnpore in 1857 formed the basis of the poem.  Massey 
				described this as an ‘historic photograph’, rather than a poem 
				in the aesthetic sense.  The book was received again rather 
				tepidly by the press, as ‘abounding in gracious phrases and 
				vigorous thought—yet quite unable to hold its place in the 
				affections or in the memory’.[26]  The 
				other material was largely ignored because, as Massey wrote in 
				his own copy, ‘And the d—d fool of an Author forgot to say that 
				the rest of the Book was new and so the Critics treated it as 
				all reprint.’  But the treatment of the poem, 
				Havelock's March, 
				was well up to the partisan standard expected of Massey when he 
				dealt with British nationalism:
 
					
						
							| 
							Come hither my brave Soldier boy, and sit you by 
							my side,
 To hear a tale, a fearful tale, a glorious tale of 
							pride;
 How Havelock with his handful, all so faithful and 
							so few,
 Held on in that far Indian land, to bear our England 
							through. . .
 
 No tramp, no cheer of Brothers near; no distant 
							cannon's boom;
 Nothing but Death goes to and fro betwixt the glare 
							and gloom.
 The living remnant try to hold their bits of 
							blood-stained ground;
 Dark gaps continual in their midst; the dead all 
							lying round;
 And saddest corpses still are those that die and do 
							not die;
 With just a little glimmering light of life to show 
							them by . . .
 |  
				He ignored or appeared unaware of one of the immediate causes 
				of the war which placed British behaviour in a less acceptable 
				stance, and resulted in gross atrocities against the British 
				residents.  Attempts to convert some of the Indian sepoys 
				to Christianity had resulted in stories of compulsory 
				conversion, and the annexation of the Oude province disbanded 
				that king's army, thereby causing much discontent and some 
				violence.  The additional story that pig and cow fat was 
				used to grease a new paper made for cartridges spread rapidly 
				among the Moslems and Hindus despite British efforts to deny it, 
				and eventually the whole Bengal army of 100,000 men became 
				involved.  The resulting massacres shocked the British 
				public.[27]  During his lecture tours in 
				the north of England Massey had made the acquaintance of John 
				King, a type-founder from Sheffield who had developed as an 
				author and poet.  As well as contributing to local papers, 
				his small number of published works included a sketch of
				Ebenezer Elliott, the Corn 
				Law rhymer, while his biography of Allesandro Gavazzi, Italian 
				priest and social reformer, had been reprinted several times and 
				was a source of finance for a number of years.  Now living 
				with his wife and three children in a third floor apartment at 7 
				Newman Street, Oxford Street, London, King was enduring 
				considerable hardship.  Unable to write due to pulmonary 
				tuberculosis which confined him to bed, he was reduced to 
				selling his household items in order to pay the rent.  
				Massey rather audaciously asked Stirling if he could visit King, 
				and perhaps get him some aid from the Literary Fund.  Good 
				natured as always, Stirling was pleased to assist.  But 
				King had already obtained £25 from the fund two years 
				previously, and they turned down his application on the grounds 
				that between that date and the present, he had not written any 
				more books.  King then ended all further chance of a grant 
				when he wrote that ‘even dogs have received the sympathies of 
				the poorest kitchen’, and that he could not stand the ordeal of 
				making another application for fear of further refusal.[28]
 
 In May or June 1861 due to more pressing financial 
				difficulties Massey wrote again to William Stirling, this time 
				querying the possibility of obtaining a grant from the Royal 
				Literary Fund on his own behalf:
 ... The immediate occasion was that my Father had just been 
				finally turned off from his 8/- per week work and his future 
				bread depended on me or the Workhouse.  He is nearly 70 
				years old and has worked at one place for 40 years.  They 
				now turn him adrift penniless … [29]  
				Whilst I was down in the North my effects were sold by the 
				Sheriff of Lancashire for debt—not a large one either, and I 
				could not help it.  Yet according to all appearance I ought 
				to be well off … For my last book I got £30 only which is not 
				much in the way of repayment for the life-blood, time, and 
				critical bullying it costs.  I don't want, and never have 
				wanted to write for a living, only my home affairs have been 
				such as prevented me from taking a situation from home … I don't 
				understand the reception of my Book. [Havelock's March and 
				other poems. Ed.]  It seems to have fallen dead almost.  
				I thought it had some life in it and would meet with a different 
				response.  I am sure of having reached a greater simplicity 
				and directness of speech.  So I am told that there is 
				nothing in the Book to equal Babe Christabel, which was a 
				merest imagery … [30]
 
				A minor appreciation of his earlier efforts to uplift the 
				working-class was made that year by a poet colleague,
				William Billington.  
				A pleasant little volume of poems, 
				Sheen and Shade, 
				had a lyric dedicated to Massey, in which he was referred to as:
 
					
						
							| 
							A second Burns, that never could be bribed,
 By Fear or Favour, to forsake the class
 Whence thou didst spring—the lowly labouring mass,
 Whose feelings, fears and hopes have tipped with 
							flame
 Thy potent pen! … [31]
 |  
				He noted Billington's kindness some years later, but at that 
				earlier time he would have preferred hard cash to pleasant 
				phrases.
 
 By November he had, on the advice of friends, decided to make 
				an application to be placed on the Civil Service Pensions List, 
				despite his disinclination to appeal to Viscount Palmerston, 
				then Prime Minister and First Lord of the Treasury.  This 
				involved asking persons of influence who knew him, his work and 
				circumstances, to write testimonials on his behalf as being a 
				proper subject for consideration.  Carlyle, Ruskin, Landor, 
				Thackeray, Browning, Lady Alford and Tennyson responded.[32]  
				His request to Tennyson sent on the 20 November, stated that he 
				was obtaining as many recommendations and testimonials as he 
				could from persons of influence and authors of eminence, and 
				that ‘… A word from you will help them much and me still more … 
				The praise my verses have got has not meant much in the shape of 
				pudding, and I find it desperate hard work to cling by the 
				skirts of literature so as not to go down quite …’[33]  
				He sent a letter also to the Rt. Hon Benjamin Disraeli, asking 
				if he would consider, in addition to the names already appended, 
				to add his.[34]  Massey hoped, if his 
				memorial was successful, to obtain a regular grant of £100 per 
				year.  Unfortunately it was not.
 
 He wrote to Stirling on 18 July 1862, ‘… You will, I presume, 
				have seen the published Pension List without my name?  I 
				suppose my chance is gone now for a year.  What I am to do 
				I don't know.  I was led to think from words dropped by 
				Lord Palmerston that the application would have been successful 
				…’[35]  Morgan Evans, who had drawn up 
				the memorial on Massey's behalf and was aware of his 
				circumstances, was able to solicit a few of the signatories of 
				the memorial to join in a small subscription fund to give aid 
				during Massey's pressing domestic difficulties.[36]  
				Lady Alford subscribed £25, but the total amount obtained is not 
				recorded.[37]
 
 During 1861 he contributed thirty-five reviews for the 
				Athenæum, which included John Greenleaf Whittier's Home 
				Ballads and Poems. ‘Here is poetry worth waiting for, a poet 
				worth listening to. . . It has the healthy smell of Yankee soil 
				with the wine of fancy poured over it …’[38]  
				Two articles for the North British Review completed his 
				literary output for that year, of which a sensitive ‘Poems 
				and Plays of Robert Browning’ referred to Browning's lack of 
				popular appeal at that time.  This was due, Massey 
				considered, to his subject matter which required philosophic 
				appreciation rather than the emotional energies of 
				identification.  Nevertheless, he admitted, together with 
				Douglas Jerrold and many others, to have found Browning's 
				‘Sordello’ incomprehensible.[39]  ‘Poets 
				and Poetry of Young Ireland’, although dealing with poets 
				less well known in England, benefited from a greater cohesive 
				structure in poetic comparisons.  The differentiation 
				between the Norse influence in Anglo-Saxon England and the 
				Celtic in Ireland can be detected, he said, by the English 
				appeals to principles, and the Irish for appeals to affection 
				for a person; to the future when hopeful, but turning to the 
				past when mournful.  These elements, Massey asserted, 
				present themselves in their poetical subject matter.  His 
				strong subjectively tonal description of the poet James Mangan, 
				who was employed in Dublin University Library, is distinctly 
				Dickensian:
 The white halo of bleached hair round the head, the dark halo 
				round his eyes—eyes of a weird blue, as of one who could see 
				spirits; a lighted corpse-like face, with that faint lavender 
				shadow which they wear who eat opium, and dream its dreams.  
				A strange figure, and yet not startling: a child would not have 
				feared to pull the old brown carmelite coat, climb the offered 
				knee, and kiss the face where queer humour and quaint pathos 
				mingled …[40]
 
				He made another attempt to obtain a permanent job around late 
				1861 or early 1862 when he answered an advertisement for a well 
				paid salaried social lead article writer for the Daily 
				Telegraph.  Following an interview and having been 
				appointed for a trial period, he was told after this time that 
				whilst he had great ability, he was unsuitable on account of his 
				articles being too political.[41]  This 
				was another disappointment, as he had hoped, if successful, to 
				have given up poetry for prose writing.  On taking up the 
				appointment he had also given up his lecturing for that winter, 
				and he found himself once again without any regular income.
 
 Following the failure of his first attempt to obtain a Civil 
				List pension, he was advised to present his memorial again to 
				the government, for consideration early in 1863.  At the 
				same time he began the necessary proceedings to make an 
				application to the Royal Literary Fund for a monetary grant.  
				This also involved obtaining testimonials from persons of note, 
				and Lady Marian Alford and Professor Blackie were, among others, 
				willing to respond.  The application proved successful with 
				the result of fifty pounds the following January.  Massey 
				wrote to the fund acknowledging that the money had come at a 
				time ‘… when my poor Wife is suffering from one of the worst 
				mental attacks she has ever had and without your assistance I 
				might have been unable to secure for her the aid and attendance 
				which was so necessary’.[42]  Rosina's 
				mental affliction had reached a crisis, and doctors were 
				pressing for her removal to a mental hospital.  Usually 
				able to control her violent episodes by mesmerism, Massey found 
				that this was not having the usual calming effect.  One 
				night they were woken up by sounds of scratching and knocking on 
				the footboard of the bed.  When nothing was found to 
				account for the noises, and the possibility of burglars had been 
				investigated, the housekeeper and her mother were called to the 
				bedroom and, by now, a hysterical Rosina.  The sounds 
				continuing, Massey thought ‘epidemic delusion’ was no answer, 
				and that the idea of ‘spirits’ making those noises was 
				disgusting.  However, by means of a code of raps, they 
				determined that the noises had been made deliberately to bring a 
				communication to their attention.  Rosina, who appeared to 
				see two people, sat up in bed, and said, ‘Mother—Mary!’  By 
				further questioning using the same code, they learned that 
				Rosina's daughter and mother were present.  Massey was told 
				not to put his wife away the next day, although she would be 
				worse, but that she would be better by the following week.  
				He was able to report later that, although the spirits had as 
				often been wrong as right, on that occasion they had been 
				perfectly correct.[43]
 
 The year 1862 continued the general unfortunate trend in 
				Massey's affairs.  Healthwise he suffered from tonsil 
				abscesses that he had to have lanced, and nervous stress showed 
				itself by palpitations of the heart.  This latter condition 
				continued throughout his life making him fear that he had heart 
				disease, despite being assured otherwise by doctors on varying 
				occasions.  That year he was able to write only four 
				reviews and one article.  In ‘The 
				Poems and other Works of Mrs Browning’ he commented (for 
				that present era) with notable exceptions of Charlotte Brontë 
				and George Eliot, on the lack of art and literature composed by 
				women due, as he considered, to their whole of life uttered in 
				one word ‘love’, and their whole world compressed in the one 
				word ‘home’.  They live reality in such fullness, and there 
				is no imperative need to seek refuge in an ideal world. And 
				then, where is the incentive to sing or write?  The late 
				Elizabeth Barrett Browning, he considered, was another of the 
				distinguished women whose imagination, tenderness, feeling and 
				vigour of thought made her poetry outstanding.  Her most 
				famous and powerful work, ‘Aurora Leigh’ competes, Massey said, 
				successfully with the novelist in enlarging the boundaries of 
				the poet's outer world.[44]
 
 In early November and yet again almost pennyless, he deplored 
				the fact that with winter approaching he was unable to afford 
				the necessary warm clothing for his children.  Furthermore, 
				because of his wife's mental condition he had been prevented 
				from making bookings for winter lecture tours.  Virtually 
				at the last minute however, he was able to arrange with Harney 
				in Jersey to present two lectures on 26 and 27 November at the 
				Lyric Hall, Cattle Street, St. Helier.  He had mentioned 
				previously the possibility of lecturing in Jersey when he wrote 
				to Harney in 1858.  In advertising the lectures a week in 
				advance he was hopeful that his wife might at the same time be 
				well enough to travel and give some poetical readings.  To 
				give Harney much credit he gave a three column introduction in 
				the Jersey Independent, with a biographical sketch of 
				Massey together with two of his poems from Havelock's March.  
				Massey should have made his first appearance on the 26th, but 
				was delayed and had missed the boat by less than a minute.  
				His first lecture on the 27th was heralded by a poem in the 
				Independent, 'Welcome to Gerald Massey', that was written 
				probably by Harney:
 
					
						
							| 
							Thou man of Nature's moulding, son of song,
 First tuned the harp the storms of life among,
 Formed by the Muse, thy meek impassion'd mind
 'Midst life's encounters, tender grew, and kind;
 It gave thee early bitter draughts to drink.
 Mid scorn and hardship, taught thee how to think,—
 To spurn oppression, hearts, and hands, to free,
 And bid the world achieve its Liberty...
 |  
				Although the hall was not filled, 'Sir Charles Napier, the 
				Conqueror of Seinde' was appreciated by the audience of about 
				150 who frequently interrupted by applauding.  But the 
				Jersey Times for reasons not stated, did not consider Massey 
				a first class lecturer.  The second lecture, ‘England's Old 
				Sea Kings; how they lived, fought and died’, had a much greater 
				attendance, and the subject matter lent itself better to 
				Massey's ‘high poetical powers …  the lecturer's 
				descriptions of our naval exploits were heart-thrilling and 
				brilliant, and were received enthusiastically by the audience’.  
				Due to the success of those two lectures, an extra booking was 
				made for ‘Yankee Humour’ early the following week.  By that 
				time Rosina was well enough to appear personally, and she was 
				able to replace her husband on the 4 December for recitations of 
				his and other more well known poets' verse:
 If an exception be made to the weakness of this lady's voice, 
				it may be said, with truth, that she reads very well; her 
				expression is sweet and pleasing, and her enunciation distinct.  
				The poems which she read embraced several of her husband's best 
				productions, interspersed with choice selections from the Poet 
				Laureate, Russell Lowell, and poor Hood … The interesting 
				entertainment closed with ‘A 
				National Anthem’, by Massey.
 
				Before leaving the Channel Isles, his wife feeling well at 
				that time, he was able to arrange two more lectures, this time 
				in Guernsey the following week.  Massey's religious 
				opinions were then not yet overtly unorthodox, so his reception 
				was in contrast to Charles Bradlaugh's lecturing venture in that 
				mainly Catholic island in 1861, when he was met with great 
				hostility.  Together with a threatened royal salute of 
				rotten eggs, placards exhorting ‘Kill the Infidel’ were 
				displayed in the town, and the lecture room was damaged.[45]  
				Massey repeated his carefully chosen ‘Old England's Sea Kings’ 
				to a highly respectable audience of about six hundred, and the 
				reporter ‘Found much to admire in his composition—much to 
				confirm the reputation to which he has attained.’  But 
				added, ‘We should observe that Mr Massey is not an elocutionist 
				…’  Massey's second lecture that week was assisted as in 
				Jersey, by Rosina's poetry readings.  ‘Mrs Massey read in 
				what may be termed "a drawing-room" style, without any attempt 
				at declamation.  Her reading was intelligent and touching 
				and was much applauded.’[46]
 
 The lecture series barely saved Massey from total financial 
				disaster that winter, and early in 1863 to his great relief he 
				heard that he would be granted a yearly allowance of £70 Civil 
				List pension.  The Scotsman announced the pension as 
				having been awarded "in appreciation of his services as a lyric 
				poet sprung from the people".  But fate had one more card 
				to play, and in May he was compelled yet again to ask William 
				Stirling for temporary assistance:
 ‘… it is the last effort I can make to save my Furniture from 
				being sold on the 16th Inst.  The Pension has not yet come, 
				and if it is not quick 'twill be too late … I have not earned a 
				penny by lecturing now these two years, not being able to leave 
				home.[47]  All my Books are in 
				pawn at Mr. Wood's High Holborn, and in the last extremity I was 
				driven to execute a ‘Bill of Sale’ on my Furniture.  And I 
				am perfectly unable to meet a payment of £6.10.0 on the 16th 
				Inst.  I do not know where to turn.  Lady Alford is in 
				Madeira with her Son.  I know no one else who could help me 
				with £10.  The position is not owing to any want of effort.  
				I have tried and tried desperately.  I have some £50 worth 
				of matter not yet used in the hands of Publishers.  But the 
				payments will come too late … P.S.  I enclose a Note which 
				refers to the Bill of Sale which gives Mr. Hollingsworth it 
				seems the right to ask for my Rent Receipts.  I don't know 
				whether it makes the matter more serious by the Rent not being 
				paid.’[48]
 
				Massey finally received his pension on 18 June, with a 
				declaration of regret conveyed by Lord Mount-Temple, that the 
				amount available at that time should have been so small. [49]
 
 Although not yet free from financial constraints, he was able 
				to repay his debts to Stirling, and his position began to show a 
				slight improvement.  Rosina, however, remained a cause of 
				much disturbance, particularly in regard to his literary affairs 
				and lecturing activities.
 
 [Chapter 5]
 |  
		
			| 
 NOTES
 |  
			| 
			1. | 
			Craigcrook Castle, 
			119-21. |  
			| 
			2. | 
			Fraser's Magazine, February 1857, 223-26. (Little Lessons for 
			Little Poets) Reprinted in Stasny, John F., Victorian Poetry.  
			A Collection of Essays from the Period (New York, Garland, 
			1986). |  
			| 
			3. | 
			Cassell's Magazine, 8, (Nov. 1873), 113-4. |  
			| 
			4. | 
			Athenæum, 25 Oct. 1856, 
			1302-3. |  
			| 
			5. | 
			Strathclyde Regional Archives, Stirling of Keir Collection. Mss. 
			TSK.27/7/221 and TSK.29/7/220. Undated. |  
			| 
			6. | The 
			Huntington Library, San Marino, California. HM. FI 3294. Undated. |  
			| 
			7. | Letter to 
			Dixon from Massey in the Mitchell Library, Glasgow. Ms. Main 891114. 
			Undated. |  
			| 
			8. | Life 
			and Letters of Sidney Dobell, 2, 94. |  
			| 
			9. | 
			Newcastle Chronicle, 29 Jan. 1858. |  
			| 
			10. | Quoted in
			The Reasoner, 6 Jan. 1858, 6. |  
			| 
			11. | Henry Buckle 
			(1821-1862). Fluent linguist and historian, freethinker and radical. 
			Author of History of Civilisation in England. In a letter 
			from 12 Henderson Row, Edinburgh, Massey thanks Buckle for ‘the 
			copies of Orsini.’ (Ms. Duke University, Great Britain papers, Misc. 
			Vol. 1, p. 24. Undated.) These probably included the Memoirs and 
			Adventures of Orsini, trans. 1857. |  
			| 
			12. | 
			Northern Daily Express, 24 Feb. 1858. |  
			| 
			13. | North 
			British Review, 28, (Feb. 1858), 231-50. |  
			| 
			14. | Stirling 
			of Keir Collection. Ms. TSK.29/8/79. Undated. |  
			| 
			15. | Ibid. Ms. TSK.29/8/30. 
			Two ms. poems are appended, that Massey sent to Stirling as an 
			example of his present political opinions, ‘A Poem for Pam’ and ‘The 
			Broad-bottomed Ministry’, Ms. TSK.29/10/135. The latter was 
			published in his next volume of poetry, 
			Havelock's March, as ‘Farmer 
			Forrest's Opinion of the Broadbottomed Ministry’. |  
			| 
			16. | Ms. The 
			Bishopsgate Institute. |  
			| 
			17. | 
			Robert Burns: A Centenary Song, 
			and Other Lyrics (Glasgow, Kent, 1859). Included also (with
			Macfarlan's poem) in 
			Anderson, G., Finlay, J., (Eds.) The Burns Centenary Poems (Glasgow, 
			Murray, 1859).  |  
			| 
			18. | Stirling 
			of Keir Collection. Ms. TSK.29/10/128. Undated. |  
			| 
			19. | The Harney Papers, 
			letter 156. Haight suggests a date of 1856 for this letter, but 
			Massey was in Edinburgh until mid 1858 prior to his move to 
			Hoddesdon. |  
			| 
			20. | Cook F., Cook, A., 
			Casualty Roll for the Crimea (London, Hayward, 1976). |  
			| 
			21. | 
			Saturday Review, 5 
			Mar. 1859, 281-2. |  
			| 
			22. | Stirling 
			of Keir Collection. Ms. TSK.29/10/134. Undated. |  
			| 
			23. | The poem 'Nicholas 
			and the British Lion' was included in W. Davenport Adams' 
			Comic Poets of the Nineteenth Century (London, Routledge, n.d. 
			[1876]). |  
			| 
			24. | 
			North British Review, 33, 
			(Nov. 1860), 461-85. |  
			| 
			25. | The 
			Huntington Library, San Marino, California. All the Year Round 
			letterbook, HM. 17507.f.114.E.A. Oppenlander's Dickens' All the 
			Year Round: Descriptive Index and Contributor List (New York, 
			Whitston, 1984), p. 281, does not give attributions to Massey's 
			poems ‘Old King Hake,’ 25 
			Aug. 1860, 468-9, ‘A Letter in 
			Black’, 1 Sep. 1860, 494-5 and ‘Poor 
			Margaret’, 3 Nov. 1860, 83-84 in All the Year Round. A 
			further poem by Massey, ‘The 
			Sunken City’ was published on 23 May 1863, p. 231 and not 
			attributed. Oppenlander, part quoting Wills' letter to Massey (p. 
			53-4) inserts ‘not’ in the paragraph quoted above, to make it read:
 ‘. . . If you do not think so, we may at this moment cry 
			"quits!"’
 
 which makes the letter sound like an ultimatum rather than 
			a polite request.  I am grateful to Sara Hodson, Curator of 
			Literary Manuscripts at The Huntington Library for providing me with 
			a full transcription of this letter.  Also in the file is a 
			letter from Wills to Massey dated 16 May 1860 in which Wills returns 
			a poem to Massey:
 
 ‘… Read the poem in our No 16, and you will find you have 
			been forestalled. It may however be a little amelioration of your 
			disappointment to know that your predecessor was your accomplished 
			landlord, Mr. W. J. Linton …’
 
 (The Huntington Library, San Marino, HM. Fl 5432). Linton's 
			poem ‘Great Odds at Sea’ [see ‘Grenville's Last Fight’] was 
			published in the issue of 13 Aug. 1859, 378-9, and included also in 
			Linton's own pasted up copy of Prose and Verse, 9, 159-62, held in 
			the British Library. Both Linton's and Massey's poems refer to the 
			sea action of Sir Richard Grenville, in which he was killed in 
			action with Spanish ships off the Azores in 1591. Massey's poem ‘Sir 
			Richard Grenville's Last Fight’ was published later in his 
			Havelock's March.
 |  
			| 
			26. | 
			Athenæum, 17 Aug. 1861, 209-10. |  
			| 
			27. | Anon., Narrative of 
			the Indian Revolt (London, Vickers, 1858). For an Indian's 
			account of the causes of the war, see pps 357-64. |  
			| 
			28. | Royal 
			Literary Fund File no. 1515. |  
			| 
			29. | In an account of some 
			incidents in his life, Massey stated that his father had been forced 
			to give up work due to breaking his leg, and the firm pensioned him 
			off with a 4d. piece. |  
			| 
			30. | Stirling 
			of Keir Collection. Ms. TSK.29/11/125-127. Undated. |  
			| 
			31. | 
			William Billington, 
			Sheen and Shade: 
			Lyrical Poems. (London, Hall & Virtue, 1861), 141. |  
			| 
			32. | Ms. letter to the Rev. 
			Henry Alford (1810-1871) Dean of Canterbury, editor of the Greek 
			Testament and the Contemporary Review, requesting his 
			signature. (Gerald Massey Collection, Upper Norwood Library, 
			London.) |  
			| 
			33. | Ms. The 
			Tennyson Research Centre, Lincoln. Undated. |  
			| 
			34. | Ms. in the Bodleian 
			Library, Dep. Hughenden 136/1, fols. 70-73, together with a copy of 
			the printed Memorial. |  
			| 
			35. | Stirling 
			of Keir Collection. Ms. TSK.29/12/176. |  
			| 
			36. | Morgan Evans 
			(1830-1899). Journalist and reviewer for the Athenæum, he 
			lived in Haverfordwest. |  
			| 
			37. | Stirling 
			of Keir Collection. Ms. TSK.29/12/65 |  
			| 
			38. | 
			Athenæum, 31 Aug. 1861, 
			276-7. |  
			| 
			39. | 
			North British Review, 
			34, (May 1861), 350-74. |  
			| 
			40. | Ibid. 
			35, (Nov. 1861), 415-44. |  
			| 
			41. | The exact dates are 
			unknown. The files of the Daily Telegraph are very scanty for 
			that period. |  
			| 
			42. | Royal 
			Literary Fund File no. 1581. |  
			| 
			43. | Medium 
			and Daybreak, 17 May 1872, 177-8. |  
			| 
			44. | 
			North British Review, 36, 
			(May 1862), 514-34. |  
			| 
			45. | Bonner, Hypatia 
			Bradlaugh, Charles Bradlaugh. A record of his life and work 2 
			vols. (London, Unwin, 1908 ed.), 1, 189-93. |  
			| 
			46. | Jersey Independent, 
			20 Nov., 25 Nov., 27 Nov., 28 Nov. 1862. Jersey Times, 
			28th Nov.,
			29 
			Nov., 1 Dec., 5 Dec., 
			8 Dec. 1862 (from the Guernsey Star). |  
			| 
			47. | He did not mention the 
			earlier lectures in Jersey, perhaps deliberately as they were not 
			part of a usual lecture circuit, or maybe he thought he would 
			receive more sympathy. |  
			| 
			48. | Stirling 
			of Keir Collection. Ms. TSK.29/13/184. Undated. |  
			| 
			49. | Colles, W.M., 
			Literature and the Pension List (London, Glaisher, 1889), 44. |    |